We performed a comparison between Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and Microsoft BitLocker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easily scalable and adaptable to the needs of the business."
"It has addressed storage and data transfer demands efficiently."
"The encryption ensures each of our drives is not invasive and that the user does not have a bad experience even while the drive is being encrypted."
"Encryption prevents data loss which can cost the organization a lot of resources."
"The initial setup is easy."
"This encryption is relatively fast and really covers the needs required."
"End-to-end encryption provides full disk encryption, ensuring that all data on the device, including the operating system."
"We never had any complaints about the performance of computers with this tool to be able to manage the protection of disks and drives."
"I liked the way it works with our Microsoft tools. As we roll out Intune, we can validate if the device has been encrypted, and if not, we can push it down. It is pretty simple to deploy."
"It's very straightforward to recover data. It's safe for us; in case of lost information, it provides multiple options to recover the data."
"It is easy to use. It is usually easy to recover someone's privacy. The manageability is much easier than McAfee. I think that Microsoft is a leader in this area. We are in the Microsoft school so our judgment of McAfee will be a little bit unfair as we recommend Microsoft all the time because of the easy manageability and support. I think that McAfee is designed for a different customer and every time we open a ticket with their support, it takes a very, very long time. The main difference is just the manageability and support. In terms of the solution itself or the functionality, I know that McAfee is very strong, but manageability and support, for us, is much more important. It's strengthens the solution for us."
"Feature-wise we have the ability to encrypt fast."
"The most valuable feature is the authentication process which is very fast."
"The solution works the way it's supposed to - stability and scalability are fine."
"It's a straightforward solution for encryption."
"The hard drive encryption is very good."
"Sometimes the performance rates are not consistent."
"The price is high for small scale business enterprises."
"I would like to bring centralized management to mobile devices."
"The response time for technical support could be faster."
"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."
"The tool is too expensive to be an add-on to the main solution. They could launch it independently so that costs can be lowered."
"The encryption is fast; however, when it comes to generating decryption of the OS disks, it is sometimes very slow, generating a loss of time."
"I rate the support from Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade a six out of ten."
"The reporting in Microsoft is very minimal."
"The pricing should be improved."
"Microsoft BitLocker needs to be an all-inclusive solution. For example, a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) cryptoprocessor is required to use Bitlocker with your computer which keeps Bitlocker from adoption beyond Windows."
"Lacks a portal that can be managed rather than just existing."
"The migration itself is a nightmare."
"The initial setup is complex."
"I would like to see improvement in the solution's central management of passwords. Currently, we install it separately."
"There is room for improvement in stability."
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is ranked 4th in Endpoint Encryption with 16 reviews while Microsoft BitLocker is ranked 1st in Endpoint Encryption with 61 reviews. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is rated 8.6, while Microsoft BitLocker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade writes "Centralized management with full disk encryption and helpful authentification capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft BitLocker writes "A solution that prevents unauthorized access and goes beyond security measures to provide protection to its users". Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is most compared with Cisco Secure Endpoint, whereas Microsoft BitLocker is most compared with ESET Endpoint Encryption, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption and Boxcryptor. See our Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Microsoft BitLocker report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors and best Mobile Data Protection vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
