We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) and Scalefusion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."If the product works, remote access will be a benefit. To this point we have not had reason to have confidence in achieving that access."
"It is very easy to use. It has a very easy interface."
"The most valuable includes managing everything from a single console."
"It is a very helpful solution."
"Application deployment and keeping the devices secure no matter where they are, by having this cloud solution — that has been great."
"It is a very stable and scalable cloud-only solution."
"The many policies available in Microsoft Intune for managing our devices are valuable."
"I like the tool's integration with Apple. Anyone who creates an ID in Intune will get an Apple ID."
"It's robust, and we like the device availability, ease of purchase, and supplier stock availability."
"The web portal provides status reporting and ease of configuration."
"It's a very easy solution for the most part, it's very easy to implement and very easy to administer."
"I have found the location analytics feature that is built into the APs to be the most valuable. It allows you to compare data and to single out individuals who are repeatedly coming into your store. We can observe different trends. This is what separates it from a lot of the other solutions."
"We can reconfigure a client’s setup remotely with minimal effort."
"The solution is simple."
"The most valuable features include remote inventory analysis, security features like geofencing, and software distribution."
"We experience no downtime, no breakdowns, all the user readings are exact, and it gives us quick analysis so we can apply security measures."
"Scalefusion is easy to use, and they have a broad knowledge base, so you can quickly find answers if you're unsure how to do something. The articles on the knowledge base are well-written, with clear steps on what to do for a specific scenario. That part is well documented."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
"There can be some added features, such as an improved dashboard. Any new feature that could be a benefit to our customers would be good."
"Data leak prevention can be integrated into it. Currently, it does not have data leak prevention."
"It should be easier to define policies and comply with those policies."
"They could also make it easier to use because there are some other products that may be easier to use in terms of the look and feel of the dashboard."
"It would be better if they can reduce the cost of the license."
"Reporting in Microsoft solutions is pathetic. With Intune, I'm getting a free inventory tool, but I don't get a reporting tool. When I go to Intune, I can see one machine's entire data in terms of the hardware and the software running on it, but I cannot generate a report for all the machines in the organization. The reporting is the only feature holding back the functionality that is already there."
"Microsoft Intune lags market leaders, such as Apperian, in its MAM capabilities."
"The cost of installing this solution can be more expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Cisco is very expensive, and I'd like to see a reduction in cost."
"There are problems with the connection on the client side, and the app that was deployed could be better."
"Linux compatibility needs improvement."
"Meraki is limiting our connections."
"The maintenance is average."
"Because Cisco has improved a lot and is competing with other technologies that are innovative and brand new to the market, the only improvements they have to make are to keep up with the current competition and remain competitive with other solutions."
"In my opinion, the equipment availabilities and competitive pricings could be improved."
"The tool's pricing needs to be more flexible like Cisco's."
"It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button. Currently, we have to sift through different groups to block a device. It would be nice if Scalefusion allowed me to block without moving the device to a different profile. Another helpful feature they could add is the ability to migrate from one MDM to another. I'd also appreciate more extensive cloud storage. They give you 1 GB by default, but sometimes that's not enough."
More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 6th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 26 reviews while Scalefusion is ranked 15th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews. Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.4, while Scalefusion is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "Easy to use and excels in generating reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Scalefusion writes "An MDM solution for controlling and restricting data on devices". Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, IBM MaaS360 and SOTI MobiControl, whereas Scalefusion is most compared with SOTI MobiControl, VMware Workspace ONE and JumpCloud. See our Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) vs. Scalefusion report.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.