We performed a comparison between Cisco Threat Grid and Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The simplicity of implementation is valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with firewalls. It's integrated with AMP so the ecosystem with equal solutions from Threat Grid is good with CISCO products."
"It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well."
"Microsoft's integration into the security stack works quite well."
"You can use it to monitor third parties and ensure they are not under threat attacks. It is beneficial in the GRC model."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the insight it provides."
"Offers easy integration with a cloud-based infrastructure"
"They have a very transparent roadmap for the product."
"Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence assesses machines for vulnerabilities and gives remediations."
"It is very scalable. There are approximately 2,000 endpoints and up to 200 servers in our company."
"I rate the tool's stability a ten out of ten."
"They come in and have multiple management solutions but it doesn't scan or doesn't have the ability to look at every file extension."
"Support must be improved."
"I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier interface for many users to interact with."
"We encounter problems connecting the product deployed on the user endpoints with the servers."
"The price could be improved."
"The tool's onboarding of users that use on-premise or hybrid environments needs to be improved."
"Having up-to-date documentation and real-time reflections in all portals would be beneficial to keep users informed about any changes. Additionally, the frequent changes in Microsoft's UI and the movement of features between different products in the set pose difficulties."
"Microsoft itself is a major target for attacks and threats due to its size and popularity. That could be considered Microsoft's Achilles heel."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
"One area that can be improved is reducing false positives."
"Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is evolving and needs to fix and enhance numerous issues like stability and licensing. The continuous rebranding and licensing changes are confusing."
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Threat Grid is ranked 21st in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is ranked 2nd in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 27 reviews. Cisco Threat Grid is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Threat Grid writes "Has good integration with firewalls but has limited file extensions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence writes "A tool that offers endpoint protection with low maintenance costs". Cisco Threat Grid is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, whereas Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, STAXX, VirusTotal, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) and Splunk Mission Control. See our Cisco Threat Grid vs. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
