We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool can proactively detect potential incidents."
"Microsoft's integration into the security stack works quite well."
"The product's anti-spam and malware-scanning features are useful. We scan email attachments, documents, and malicious codes."
"It is very scalable. There are approximately 2,000 endpoints and up to 200 servers in our company."
"I rate the tool's stability a ten out of ten."
"I value how Threat Intelligence integrates with the different platforms in Microsoft."
"Offers easy integration with a cloud-based infrastructure"
"It just runs in the background. I don't have to worry about, making sure it's Intelligence. So, you know, this kind of makes it very easy, have to worry about installing. It is easy to use."
"ThreatConnect has a highly user-friendly interface."
"The product automatically generated a threat score based on the maliciousness of an IP."
"It's a solid platform and is stable enough. It is not complicated and is easy to use."
"The most valuable features are ease of use and the ability to customize it."
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pros →
"It would be beneficial to enhance the pricing structure and make it more affordable."
"The solution could be more stable and precise because, at times, the threats detected are not legitimate."
"Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence should integrate with different platforms."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
"While the current setup meets our needs, Microsoft can constantly improve customization and adaptability to rapidly evolving cybersecurity threats."
"The price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the solution's price needs to be reduced."
"The tool's onboarding of users that use on-premise or hybrid environments needs to be improved."
"One area that can be improved is reducing false positives."
"It would be good to have more feeds and more integrated sources for enrichment."
"Integration is an area that could use some improvement."
"They should make it a little bit easier to generate events and share them with the community"
"I couldn’t get any training videos online when I was working with the tool."
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Cons →
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is ranked 2nd in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 27 reviews while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is ranked 4th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 4 reviews. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is rated 8.4, while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence writes "A tool that offers endpoint protection with low maintenance costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) writes "The tool could be integrated into any environment, but it was expensive, and the deployment process was complex". Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, STAXX, Cisco Threat Grid, VirusTotal and Splunk Mission Control, whereas ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is most compared with Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future, ThreatQ, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Anomali Match. See our Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.