We performed a comparison between Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and Claroty Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Microsoft, Citrix and others in Remote Access."Because of the solution's ubiquity, it is easier to find answers to problems than with competitive products."
"The shadow feature is extraordinary and helps a lot when supporting remote users."
"It virtualizes the application on your desktop."
"The most valuable feature is the gateway to a remote connection, to a physical or a virtual PC. Compared to a normal VPN client and connection, the connection via Citrix is more stable and does not consume as much network bandwidth."
"Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops is a stable solution."
"The architecture I built had a robust failover mechanism for the endpoints, and the interface was user-friendly."
"You can connect to any printer, and from anywhere you can print documents using a compressed channel. It is easy and the bandwidth is very low."
"The only thing that is really important for me is being able to connect from wherever I am. It is important for me because sometimes I am in places where there are not enough safe conditions to be able to work safely, in terms of security and confidentiality of my data. Being able to access internal resources from a secure platform allows me to work without fearing that my data has been stolen."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Pros →
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"It is not easy to set up."
"The cost of Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops is high and has room for improvement."
"There are many latency and slowness issues, which are things looked after by Citrix."
"Their customer support can be improved a lot as it lacks a lot of knowledgeable help."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The user profiles could use some improvement."
"I think they can improve the troubleshooting to make it easier for users to solve problems on their own. For example, it could provide an error code and some instructions on how to reconnect to the database or do something proactive to fix the issue with the system."
"We encounter compatibility issues related to hardware, scanners, and other devices."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Cons →
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is ranked 3rd in Remote Access with 90 reviews while Claroty Platform is ranked 23rd in Remote Access with 1 review. Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is rated 8.4, while Claroty Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) writes "Flexible Deployment, reliable performance, and fast transmission speeds". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Claroty Platform writes "Provides good visibility of the devices in a user's environment". Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is most compared with Amazon Appstream, VMware Horizon View, Citrix Workspace, Amazon WorkSpaces and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, whereas Claroty Platform is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Darktrace and Armis.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
