We performed a comparison between Comodo RMM and Kaseya VSA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The management feature is very good. You get a complete and clear view of the employment tool on Linux, Mac, and Windows operating systems (even on mobile). Third-party integration is also possible (e.g., IBM, Apple, etc.)."
"The most valuable features of Comodo RMM are the security antivirus and the ability to use other applications like the PSA and the ticketing system on one dashboard."
"We like the auto containment feature."
"VSA installs an agent on every computer that allows users to create a help desk ticket with one click. That's why I chose VSA. Many users never create tickets when they have a problem. Sometimes I won't know about an issue until they run into me and say, "Hey, this has been broken for two months.""
"The solution was scalable."
"I like the remote control, audit, inventory, patch management, software management, and monitoring features."
"The most valuable part of this solution is the security features that it offers."
"The remote support is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"We can schedule the patching of the endpoints."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ability to offer control remotely to its users and provide patching capabilities to users."
"The most valuable features of Kaseya VSA are remote control, live connect, and automation."
"Comodo RMM is really, really slow to load, and connecting with most of my clients takes a while."
"The solution needs further integration with other software tools like a CRM and other accounting tools. Not having this integration makes Comodo RMM limited in functionality. Additionally, more network management features would be good to have in the next release."
"They should integrate email security in the same solution."
"There should be more Mac support. Whenever a new Mac operating system comes out, the support is very limited. It takes them a while to get things up to date. We're seeing more and more people move to Mac from the Windows environment for various reasons, but their support for Mac is very limited. A lot of it might have to do with Mac itself, but there are ways to improve upon that. That would be my biggest thing for improvement."
"The predefined reports are not up to the mark and you have to do a lot of customization."
"I would like to see improved virtual infrastructure management."
"Sometimes, the product misinterprets the functionality of a machine."
"The stability of the solution is good but it can be improved."
"I believe we should include a VSA license to provide complete endpoint management."
"Kaseya VSA could be improved with more features to support the latest operating systems."
"There is room for improvement in the remote control strengths."
Comodo RMM is ranked 11th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 3 reviews while Kaseya VSA is ranked 2nd in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 29 reviews. Comodo RMM is rated 8.4, while Kaseya VSA is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Comodo RMM writes "Great remote controlling and monitoring features with a competitive price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaseya VSA writes "Single portal management, cost-saving, with thorough technical support". Comodo RMM is most compared with NinjaOne and Atera, whereas Kaseya VSA is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, ConnectWise Automate, NinjaOne, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services and Datto Remote Monitoring and Management. See our Comodo RMM vs. Kaseya VSA report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.