We performed a comparison between CrowdStrike Falcon and Panda Adaptive Defense 360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is stable and scalable."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The stability is very good."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"The setup is pretty simple."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"CrowdStrike Falcon is effortless to use, and it's a cloud-specific platform. You only need to deploy the light agents on the licensed endpoints, and you're ready to work. Your dashboards will tell you the number of the endpoints being protected and the incidents. There are also incident dashboards with alerts that will tell you about the details."
"We have seen a reduction to the performance hit to our operating systems."
"The anomaly detection is the most valuable feature."
"As an EDR tool, we can integrate log management and event management. The solution deals with threats automatically, that's the advantage."
"It is an easy product to deploy."
"This solution has made the lives of the IT staff much easier, compared to the previous one."
"The initial setup is a very fast process."
"The threat intelligence is the most valuable feature."
"It offers an easy initial setup."
"We have control over our devices, specifically USB ports, allowing us to block or control the traffic."
"Great technical support staff."
"The dashboard management feature is valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the web filter application control."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its device control."
"The product so far has been good at protecting us. We haven't faced a breach."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that I like the tool's UI, ease of management, ease of making reports, and the ability to export information easily."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The solution is not stable."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"We have had to open a case with the technical support to get some issues and bugs resolved."
"CrowdStrike Falcon could improve by adding manual scanning or serverless scanning. It is not available at this time."
"The console is not user-friendly or visually appealing and has room for improvement."
"CrowdStrike Falcon could improve the EDR functionality. Once the functionality of the solution improves, it will be even better in the market and able to compete with Carbon Black."
"The biggest issue with Falcon as a standalone product is it doesn't have very much reporting."
"This solution could be improved with greater scope for admins to make changes to the solution."
"The detection time has room for improvement."
"The console is a little cluttered and at times, finding what you're looking for is not intuitive."
"For some urgent updates, I don't like the need for the tool to be frequently restarted."
"The gap between the two final conclusions is a problem, whether or not a file is known to be malware or is known to be safe."
"Panda Security Adaptive Defense’s stability could be improved."
"It would be nice if Panda Security Adaptive Defense could come out with remote desktop usage."
"I'd like to integrate it into my main services."
"It needs some improvements in the DNS security feature. Currently, it does not have full DNS security. It only has semi-DNS security, which can be improved. It is an important feature for us, and it would be really good if they can improve the DNS security feature. Our group has some plans to change to Cisco AMP, which has features such as DNS, Umbrella. We are trying to learn about Cisco AMP and compare it with Panda."
"t would help if it would monitor the network better."
"The solution should have additional endpoint protection."
CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 107 reviews while Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is ranked 22nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 26 reviews. CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.8, while Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 writes "Managing multiple machines is a pain, but support is top notch". CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Microsoft Defender XDR, Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, whereas Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and WatchGuard EPDR. See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.