We performed a comparison between Datadog and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Datadog has clear dashboards and good documentation."
"The solution has improved the organization by providing good insights into app performance and offering good dashboards."
"The observability on offer is the most useful aspect of the product."
"Flame graphs are pretty useful for understanding how GraphQL resolves our federated queries when it comes to identifying slow points in our requests. In our microservice environment with 170 services."
"Sometimes it's more user friendly for development teams. There are some parts of Datadog that are more understandable for development teams. For example, the APM in Datadog works more manually and works like the tools in New Relic or Grafana, or Elastic. It is easier to understand for software development teams."
"Integrating Datadog with other platforms has made our monitoring processes a bit easier. It's not super simple, but it's manageable."
"Dashboards and their versatility are among the most valuable features."
"It provides more cloud data. They tend to just get the way a service would be designed on the cloud."
"Deploys faster new virtual services."
"By being able to deploy servers very quickly and rapidly, we can respond to any business requirement needed."
"We also have the 3PAR and the GUI is almost the same. So the recognition is very good."
"Easy to add servers and get them monitored and manageable."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Administration-wise it's going to be easier. More smooth and more flexible."
"Profile templates: The ability to generate the profiles and lay them down so the servers are built consistently. I would say that's probably the biggest piece of it."
"Gives the business interfaces to view real-time pictures of IT business services."
"The logging could be improved in the future."
"At times, it can be hard to generate metrics out of logs."
"There are things about it that we would like to be fixed, such as it is taking averages of average. This results in data that we don't expect."
"I sometimes log in and see items changed, either in the UI or a feature enabled. To see it for the first time without proper communication can sometimes come as a shock."
"The product could do better with its notifications."
"Once agents are connected to the Datadog portal, we should be able to upgrade them quickly."
"It would be ideal if the product offered a bit more monitoring from our dashboard."
"They could have better log reporting."
"I would like to see support for things that aren't in the current generation. We have a lot of 7th and 8th generation hardware."
"HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy."
"I saw, maybe three years ago or two years ago here, or in Barcelona, at the HPE Discover conference, a feature that you can update Clusterware with VMware. But the feature is still not live in production. Currently, you have to do all the firmware updates and then you have to do the VMware updates. So you have two reboots and it would be better if it was just one."
"The solution could add storage, integration services, and end-to-end support for Cisco switches or other competitor products."
"There was a feature called HPE cloud manager, but now it is owned by Micro Focus. HPE should make a cloud optimizer again."
"We've had a few issues. We just upgraded to the 3.9.0 version. We think that now that we are on that version, hopefully a lot of those things are going to go away for us."
"We have a version 3 and a version 1.2, but the upgrade process from the 1.2 to the 3 is kind of an issue."
"They can improve reporting and provide more customized reports. Currently, reporting is a bit limited. It can be complex to learn and manage for beginners. Because of my experience, I find it comfortable to manage, which might not be the case with beginners. It would be good if they can make it a little bit easier to understand. They can provide a more graphical view of connectivity and other things. Their technical support can also be improved."
Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 137 reviews while HPE OneView is ranked 16th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and ServiceNow IT Operations Management. See our Datadog vs. HPE OneView report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.