We performed a comparison between Datadog and Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."I have found the logging and tracing features the most valuable."
"The fact that everything is under a single pane of glass is really valuable, as developers don't have to spend their time copying correlation IDs across tools to find what they need."
"The application performance monitoring is pretty good."
"Its integration definitely stands out. It provides seamless monitoring of all our systems, services, apps, and whatever else we secure and monitor. Visualizations have become simpler with dashboards. We are getting visibility into systems, services, and apps stack through a single pane of glass, which is good. We are able to put logs in context."
"We've been able to glean from the monitors what servers are down, and can alert the team in Slack."
"The product has offered increased visibility via logging APM, metrics, RUM, etc."
"Datadog has given us near-live visibility across our entire cloud platform."
"The interface and the integrations make it so easy to connect to the cloud or to the on-premise environment."
"Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical VMs, high CPU usage, security concerns."
"The ease of implementation needs improvement."
"We primarily use the log management functionality, and the only feedback I have there is better fuzzy text searching in logs (the kind that Kibana has)."
"Lately, chat support has a longer waiting time."
"Geo-data is also something very critical that we hope to see in the future."
"I'm not sure if Datadog can monitor K8s deployments in real-time. For instance, being able to see a deployment step by step visually. This would be helpful if there were any incidents during the deployment."
"The correlation between the logs and the metrics needs improvement as most cases, we might use another logging tool (that is cheaper in cost) which we then have to link together."
"Federated views for Datadog dashboards are critical as large companies utilize multiple instances of the product and cannot link the metrics or correlate the metrics together. This stunts the usage of Datadog."
"The dashboard could be improved. It would be helpful to get a view of specific things that we need to monitor for our application."
"Third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service."
More Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 137 reviews while Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is ranked 40th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 1 review. Datadog is rated 8.6, while Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service writes "Offers real-time alerting and dashboards are great for performance hubs of the database". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios XI and Nagios Core.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.