We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Continuous Testing and LambdaTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."
"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."
"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."
"The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI."
"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."
"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."
"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."
"It is a scalable solution."
"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."
"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."
"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."
"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."
"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."
"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."
"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."
"Their smart testing module needs improvement."
"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Digital.ai Continuous Testing is ranked 28th in Test Automation Tools while LambdaTest is ranked 15th in Test Automation Tools with 22 reviews. Digital.ai Continuous Testing is rated 6.6, while LambdaTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Continuous Testing writes "Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation". Digital.ai Continuous Testing is most compared with Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca and Sauce Labs, whereas LambdaTest is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and Perfecto. See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. LambdaTest report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.