We performed a comparison between ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"The most valuable features of ESET Endpoint Antivirus are the search engine, easy firewall setup, and ransomware scans."
"I like the integration; it lets you see the product installed on a particular computer."
"The inspection feature allows complete monitoring"
"The tools and the features available with this solution are very competitive. It is always updated to prevent upcoming attacks."
"The product is quite affordable."
"All of our devices are integrated with the solution."
"We have not picked up a bug yet, because we use ESET, which is a tried and proven system."
"The solution has very useful MDM features."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The performance is good."
"It's a stable solution with good performance."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."
"The activation of features within ENS and the collection of threats into a single console is a strong point."
"It is easy to use, flexible, and stable. Because it is a cloud-based solution and it integrates all endpoints of the cloud, we can do an IOC-based search. It can search the entire enterprise and tell us the endpoints that are possibly compromised."
"FireEye Endpoint Security's scalability is awesome. I think it is one of the best on that front."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The support needs improvement."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"It's not scalable in that you cannot use a license for multiple devices."
"ESET's updates are mostly manual. That's my biggest concern. I'd like it to be more automatic. I've had to download the new version and run it manually to install it. I've got several workstations like that right now."
"They can improve ransomware protection, and there should be cloud sandboxing for Mac."
"The proactive feature is excellent, but I do not believe ESET will make any changes to this feature in the future."
"The scalability could be better."
"The product should provide a one-click option to renew the licenses."
"I used Avira previously and ESET lacks certain aspects in comparison to Avira."
"ESET Endpoint Security should offer more integration with multi-attack frameworks."
"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."
"MVISION Endpoint is only compatible with Windows 10 and Windows 2016 and above. If I were using a Linux operating system, I would not be able to use MVISION Endpoint."
"Performance is a problematic area in the solution needing improvement."
"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."
"Most of these types of solutions including others, such as Carbon Black and FortiEDR, all have the same features. However, Carbon Black is the leader when it comes to being robust and user-friendly and this solution should improve in those areas to stay more competitive."
"We would like to solution to offer better security."
"The solution needs to work on memory consumption. It is too high."
"I would like to see more automation."
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 9th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 99 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 49 reviews. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup". ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR. See our ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.