We performed a comparison between F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)."Initial setup is easy and pretty standard."
"I have found F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) to be stable."
"It is a fast and available solution."
"The most valuable feature is customization."
"The solution is easy to install. It's a straightforward process."
"The product is very stable. We put a decent amount of stress on it given our load."
"The configuration and integration into the AWS environment was pretty easy."
"I was able to simply and quickly set up the WAF rules and security, and also set up easily complex policies and rules which gave me some great features to redirect."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"Implementing whitepapers with a lot more applications could easily be added."
"It's a very expensive solution."
"The initial setup can take a long time."
"The deployment can take some time because you can do a lot of configuring to meet the needs of the use cases for clients."
"Technical support could be faster. It's something I'd like to see them work on in the future."
"I'm not very sure about the security with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). We have our own private data center, but we are going to migrate our private data center into the Azure cloud environment. Security will then be a major concern when we migrate our own whole infrastructure to the public cloud."
"For a future release, I would like to see more features in the cloud."
"F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is expensive. Pricing needs to be improved."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is ranked 1st in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 116 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 34th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is rated 8.2, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) writes "Reduces maintenance downtime and has a strong user community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, Fortinet FortiADC, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, NGINX Plus and A10 Networks Thunder ADC, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.