We performed a comparison between Forescout Platform and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Compliance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is easy to use."
"The standout strength of this solution lies in its unique capability to effectively manage unmanaged switches."
"The most valuable feature of the Forescout Platform it's highly customizable and flexible."
"I have noticed that in the last year the license model has changed from licensing the whole appliance to licensing the number of devices. It's more simple for a large installation, or a user to have CounterACT as their peripheral site in the company. It's a good choice to have changed the license policy."
"The most valuable features of the Forescout Platform are ease of management and outstanding visibility. The visibility is simple to obtain."
"This solution can be used to organize guest portals, integrate switches, and create policies. Some of its standard use cases also include completing key process upgrades and anti-virus of Windows OS."
"The scalability is good."
"It's one of the tools that has given the federal government visibility into network devices and everything."
"The main benefit is the threat intelligence network of Trend Micro."
"The most valuable feature is the behavior monitoring."
"The end user perspective is very good because the solution isn't complex to learn and support is readily available."
"he setup is simple."
"Trend Micro Apex One is a seamless solution compared to others."
"The most valuable features are the vulnerability protection and virtual patching."
"Stability-wise, it is a good product, and I rate it a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is that it's normal, and not for a specific server."
"When adding what is in scope to a policy, it would be nice if you could select multiple policies instead of one policy at a time to add what is in the scope for network segmentation. I have found that during the install and configuration of the policies that if you want to modify multiple policies or enable multiple policies that you need to define what is in the scope (IP range or segments) one rule at a time. This caused some slow downs when implementing policies."
"The cost is too high."
"It's scalable, but not without a big investment. It doesn't do so well at the branch. At the home office, it does okay and not so well at the branch."
"The initial setup was complex."
"For the user, the policy that they have implemented sometimes needs adjustments. Sometimes the features that the customer asks for aren't involved in the main installation, and I need to bolt an add-on in. However, I never know if this policy is the right one when I do this."
"Can be expensive if it's only being used for one feature."
"Forescout Platform could improve the vulnerability management as well as the control on the endpoint, which needs to be connected to my network."
"Initially, the implementation of the Forescout Platform took some time to figure out. The reason is we are a manufacturing unit and we have certain silos that are insulated areas where certain systems will not connect to the internet or to the LAN. Since there are many parts of it, we have to have an inclusive view of all those systems. It took a while for us to initially implement, but after a few months, everything worked well."
"I would like to see better reporting."
"Lacking features, not yet fully mature."
"The integration capabilities of the solution could be improved."
"Apex One uses a lot of RAM and other physical resources, and I also don't like the web interface."
"Trend Vision One Endpoint Security should have a DLP (Data loss prevention) module."
"There is room for improvement in next-gen attacks protection."
"Whether the license is monthly or annual depends on the deal of the company."
"Apex One's threat and vulnerability management has room for improvement."
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forescout Platform is ranked 4th in Endpoint Compliance with 69 reviews while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is ranked 3rd in Endpoint Compliance with 125 reviews. Forescout Platform is rated 8.4, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security writes "We can get consolidated logs of suspicious objects and malware attacks in a single console". Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Armis, whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Vision One, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our Forescout Platform vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Compliance vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Compliance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.