We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiGate-VM and Juniper SRX Series Firewall based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Fortinet FortiGate-VM is highly regarded for its robust security features, including geofencing, IPS, antivirus, and a user-friendly interface. Additionally, it is praised for its strong firewall capabilities. Juniper SRX Series Firewall is appreciated for its ease of use and intuitive interface. It is also valued for its reliable support, site-to-site VPN functionality, and effective firewall protection.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM has room for improvement in several areas including key activation, internal log management, cloud management, monitoring tools, hardening, availability, clustering, throughput, customization, pricing model, troubleshooting forum, and guidance. Juniper SRX Series Firewall requires improvements in capacity limitations, pricing strategy, reporting and alerts, user interface, device reliability, documentation, and feature enhancements.
Service and Support: The customer service for Fortinet FortiGate-VM has mixed feedback. Some customers appreciate the fast response and expertise of the support team, while others believe there is room for improvement. Customers generally express contentment with the customer service of Juniper SRX Series Firewall, finding the support to be valuable and prompt. Nonetheless, there have been occasions where response times were slower.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Fortinet FortiGate-VM is generally simple and user-friendly, with users noting its ease of deployment. The initial setup for Juniper SRX Series Firewall can be completed relatively quickly for small-scale branch offices yet may require more time for complex environments. While some users found it to be effortless and plug-and-play, others mentioned a learning curve and the necessity of CLI experience.
Pricing: The setup cost for Fortinet FortiGate-VM is flexible and reasonable, offering choices for yearly or monthly licenses. Juniper SRX Series Firewall is priced in the middle, with a generally straightforward setup cost.
ROI: Fortinet FortiGate-VM provides enhanced security and stability, resulting in a high ROI rating from users. It is crucial to select the appropriate size initially to ensure a favorable return on investment. Juniper SRX Series Firewall offers reliability, uptime, and advanced security features, leading to a positive ROI for users.
Comparison Results: Fortinet FortiGate-VM is the preferred choice over Juniper SRX Series Firewall. Customers appreciate Fortinet FortiGate-VM for its robust security features, user-friendly nature, effortless deployment, and intuitive interface. The product also stands out for its exceptional support provided during deployment.
"We purchased Fortinet because of the pricing, its functionality, because it met our requirements, and the total cost of ownership over five years was quite reasonable. In the market, Fortinet is rated quite well."
"The network security and cloud security are most valuable."
"One of the valuable features is a standardized OS."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the analytics."
"The security features are about the best that I've seen anywhere."
"Mainly the FortiGate reporting system is very good. It guides us through all the expectations of security. Fortinet provides us all that we need for security. Also, Fortinet FortiGate is a next-generation firewall. It is much more advanced than others."
"It's very easy to configure."
"It's a user-friendly firewall. Most of the tasks are very simple. It's simple to configure and troubleshoot this firewall."
"The dashboards are a good feature."
"The setup is simple."
"The user interface is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"Technical support is very helpful."
"We are able to closely monitor the usages of individual users and see their usage habits and other items, including the data itself, which gives us quite a bit of visibility."
"It's a very simple solution to manage."
"Initial setup is very straightforward with a wizard, if needed."
"Fortinet FortiGate-VM is purpose-built as a next-generation firewall, excelling in its performance of this specific function."
"We're primarily using Juniper's EPA feature, but not the other things. We use it to manage different points of firewalling of routing."
"The solution has proven to be quite stable."
"It's fine, and it's good. It's very stable."
"It protects from distributed denial-of-service attacks with Screen Options."
"The most powerful feature in Juniper SRX is definitely NCLS."
"It is very fast and very easy to maintain. Another nice part of it is that you can easily extract the logs and move them over to a security operations center."
"It is a complete security bundle. The cloud-based Sky Advanced Threat Prevention feature is very valuable. I am 100% satisfied with the performance of the Juniper firewall. It has a very good throughput. It works very fine. We use our firewall as a site-to-site VPN or Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN). In both cases, it has a very good and optimum performance. Their service support is very good in India. I get really good support from the Juniper team."
"The most valuable feature is robustness."
"It is quite new for us, and we need to go more in-depth into the monitoring tools. It provides different features that we need to do what we want. So far, it is okay for us. In terms of improvement, in the future, they can provide a faster implementation of features. Some of the features are first available in other solutions. Fortinet sometimes takes a little bit longer than other solutions, such as Check Point, to implement new features."
"If they had better integration with security products, such as Cisco ISE or Rapid Threat Containment, then it would be an improvement."
"I would like to see improvements made to the dashboard and UI, as well as to the reporting."
"The product does need better support in the cloud environment. It's not exactly cloud-native right now."
"There is one big configuration file with no separations for the unique VDOMs. Maybe they could separate individual VDOM configuration files with the root VDOM configuration file referencing the individual VDOM config files."
"We would like to see an upgrade to the VPN feature, we are using the VPN from outside of our office and there is a limitation to 10 connections, more connections would be suitable."
"The solution could be more evenly structured."
"Technical support is good but the response time could be faster."
"Their offering for MFA isn't the cleanest."
"It has a monitoring tool, but it could be improved."
"I have had a data issue with physical devices that could improve."
"The price and licensing of the solution can be better."
"The management tools should be more user-friendly."
"The key activation is very complicated at times."
"SD-WAN could be enhanced to provide a clear division between control and data planes, utilizing controllers to manage tasks within the network."
"There should be a bit more automation."
"Juniper SRX could improve by adding an IPX feature."
"In the next release, I would like to have a better web interface. It needs to be more user-friendly. Right now, you can only access many features through the console."
"As a networking person, I don't really have any major issues with this device. Based on my experience of using it in a cluster, it could be more stable. I had an incident when one of the SRXs in a cluster couldn't learn ARP. It is a good solution, but firewalls don't seem to be an area of development for Juniper. They are focusing on data centers, routers, and switches, not firewalls."
"it would be more powerful if Juniper brought out a security product other than the firewall, like anti-spam, endpoint protection, etc. Customers who want to deploy security solutions are not just thinking about firewalls... Juniper should have an end-to-end solution, from the endpoint to the network level."
"While the GUI is pretty good on the Juniper side, there can still be tweaks made to it that will make it even better."
"The big thing is performance. With all the features turned on it slows down."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The Juniper product has to improve in terms of innovation."
Fortinet FortiGate-VM is ranked 9th in Firewalls with 113 reviews while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is ranked 18th in Firewalls with 86 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate-VM is rated 8.4, while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate-VM writes "An easy-to-manage and configure tool that provides ample documentation to help with the setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper SRX Series Firewall writes "Highly scalable, user-friendly UI, and easy to maintain". Fortinet FortiGate-VM is most compared with Azure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks VM-Series, Fortinet FortiOS, OPNsense and Cisco Secure Firewall, whereas Juniper SRX Series Firewall is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Netgate pfSense, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Check Point NGFW. See our Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Juniper SRX Series Firewall report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors and best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.