We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiSandbox and NetWitness Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is very good because it catches a lot of threats in emails."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox's most valuable feature is the security it provides against threats, such as ransomware. Additionally, it integrates well with APIs."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiSandbox are customization, ICAP protocol, and integration with other vendors. Additionally, the security work very well."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox puts suspicious files in quarantine, analyzes for virus risks, and lets them out of quarantine if it detects no risk."
"The most valuable feature is the protection and the way it works, the technology is what I like the most."
"Performance is a valuable feature."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox is faster than other sandbox solutions."
"The most valuable features are its ingestion of logs and raising of alerts based on those logs."
"Their technical support responds quickly and are knowledgable."
"The most valuable features are the integration and ease of use."
"Setting up NetWitness is straightforward. There are multiple connectors, including standard and specialized connectors. One purpose of the connectors is the enhanced capability integrate the custom applications. NetWitness comes with E6 appliances and application images that we use for the initial configurations and for the OS stack information. From there, you can consider the correlation rules, integrate the different log sources, and easily create correlation rules and backlog reports."
"Incident management is its most valuable feature."
"It's quite economical compared to other solutions in the market."
"Alerting Module: It provides real-time event processing language on all the logs/packets stream for advanced alerting, i.e., using SQL LIKE statements."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to write rules and triggers for network communication, and then being able to investigate based on that."
"If you were to compare prices between vendors and manufacturers, you would see that the lowest equipment in the Sandbox line is quite expensive for a new customer."
"It would be better if it had support for Mac and Linux."
"In future releases, I would like to see more automation capabilities."
"In the next release, I would like to see machine learning and anti-exploitation included."
"The initial setup is not too complex but could be easier."
"Something that needs to improve, is the end-point protection."
"The delivery feature in my country is extremely bad."
"The reporting tools could be improved in Fortinet FortiSandbox."
"Sometimes, it gives me static when integrating Windows-based systems. It should produce a precise log of sorts as to where the problem is. For example, a few days ago because of the McAfee application firewall, I couldn't get access to the particular Windows machine. So, my team and I had to figure out by ourselves that there was a virus responsible for the obstacle. This solution should trigger a meaningful log or message indicating the reason the user or implementer can't get into the machine."
"More customizability is required, which is something that they need to improve on."
"The log system is a bit complex and has room for improvement."
"The tool's integration capability isn't so great."
"The initial setup is complex. There are other solutions that are easier to implement."
"The initial setup was complex because it takes a lot of time to complete the implementation."
"Security needs improvement."
"We have encountered issues with unresolved crashes."
Fortinet FortiSandbox is ranked 5th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 36 reviews while NetWitness Platform is ranked 18th in Log Management with 36 reviews. Fortinet FortiSandbox is rated 8.2, while NetWitness Platform is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Light and powerful solution design; useful to have". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetWitness Platform writes "Can find out if there is lateral movement, but integration and workflow need improvement". Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Trellix Network Detection and Response, Check Point SandBlast Network, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and Fortinet FortiEDR, whereas NetWitness Platform is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, RSA enVision, IBM Security QRadar, Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Microsoft Sentinel. See our Fortinet FortiSandbox vs. NetWitness Platform report.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.