GitHub vs IBM Rational ClearCase comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitHub Logo
4,163 views|1,715 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
911 views|636 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitHub and IBM Rational ClearCase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We can make a private repository.""Even if I'm not in the office, I can access and work on my code from anywhere with my account credentials.""The solution has been stable for us.""The initial setup was straightforward.""Complication free with good ability for third-party integrations.""The versioning of the code and the tracking of changes are definitely some of my top features.""The solution can scale.""I'm able to access any repository that I like, whether it's public or private."

More GitHub Pros →

"The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools, including some change management tools. The overall process was normal.""ClearCase integrates well with other engineering tools and frameworks such as the Eclipse environment.""IBM Rational ClearCase is a stable solution. I have not had any difficulty with reliability."

More IBM Rational ClearCase Pros →

Cons
"The GitHub repository needs an upgraded user interface and overall UI improvements.""The onboarding process could be simplified.""I think it would be valuable to have more security. Some of the data is very open to everyone.""The UI is a little outdated, so that could be improved.""This solution could be improved by offering crowd sourced support where we could ask questions to other users.""The solution's cost is high and should be reduced.""The solution needs some more controls for deleting code.""We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."

More GitHub Cons →

"The protection needs to be improved.""I have found it very difficult to understand many functionalities in IBM Rational ClearCase. We have had many problems and it is not user-friendly.""The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool."

More IBM Rational ClearCase Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The private repositories are free, which is very good."
  • "It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."
  • "The price of this solution is reasonable."
  • "If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."
  • "We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."
  • "I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."
  • "The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."
  • More GitHub Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This is a very expensive product."
  • "IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive."
  • More IBM Rational ClearCase Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.
    Top Answer:We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution. If you buy extra support, you pay an additional cost.
    Top Answer:The solution's cost is high and should be reduced. Our company has a bundle product. Sometimes, people from outside our organization also need to collaborate with our code, and we need to integrate… more »
    Top Answer:The tool had features similar to Git for version control. It offered branching and merging capabilities, providing better control over code management. Integration was possible with other tools… more »
    Top Answer:IBM Rational ClearCase, like any other IBM tool, is expensive.
    Top Answer:The solution's UI is slow compared to other tools. It is an old tool.
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    4,163
    Comparisons
    1,715
    Reviews
    56
    Average Words per Review
    359
    Rating
    8.6
    8th
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    911
    Comparisons
    636
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    197
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Snyk logo
    Compared 28% of the time.
    AWS CodeCommit logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Fortify on Demand logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Bitbucket logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Rational ClearCase
    Learn More
    Overview
    GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

    IBM Rational ClearCase is an enterprise-grade configuration management system that provides controlled access to software assets, including requirements, design documents, models, test plans and test results. It be can be integrated with other IBM solutions, including IBM Rational Team Concert, IBM Rational ClearQuest, IBM Rational Asset Manager and IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere Software.

    Sample Customers
    Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
    Atos SE, FEI, STM
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company23%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 74 reviews while IBM Rational ClearCase is ranked 8th in Version Control with 6 reviews. GitHub is rated 8.6, while IBM Rational ClearCase is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational ClearCase writes "Useful for version control but UI is slow ". GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Fortify on Demand, Bitbucket and GitLab, whereas IBM Rational ClearCase is most compared with Git, Bitbucket, IBM Rational ClearQuest, Helix Core and Endevor. See our GitHub vs. IBM Rational ClearCase report.

    See our list of best Version Control vendors.

    We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.