We performed a comparison between GoToWebinar and Microsoft Teams based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is browser-based and simple, which is an advantage over other solutions."
"We were able to build our own customer portal and integrate into GoToWebinar with a seamless interface."
"This solution is very reliable. It is easy to switch between audio and microphone when using headphones."
"I can extract the activity and the attendance reports, along with every single question that was asked during the webinar, which is a feature that we highly value."
"All of their features are good. They are more or less equivalent to the competition. There's less disturbance, less jitter, the voice is always good even at a low bandwidth."
"I am impressed with the tool's integration with SharePoint where we can access it with a single click from the platform. The solution is available in web and mobile versions so it gives a seamless experience when we move from one device to another. Especially when you're on the calls, you don't need to get out of one device, and then log in to another, and then join that meeting. You need to just switch."
"The initial setup was really straightforward and easy."
"Setting up Teams was not difficult."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to have remote meetings with customers and colleagues."
"The group chat is very good."
"The most valuable features are the messaging and the video calling, especially where you can add a background."
"Message and chat retention is a valuable feature."
"The corporate world widely accepts the solution for virtual meetings. Also, it has good availability."
"The platform feels old and a little rusty, more could be invested into the look and feel of it."
"The sharing of cameras is limited to meeting organizers."
"The chat window and using polls is easier in Zoom than compared to GoToWebinar. Make it simpler and easier to publish polls on the fly would improve the solution."
"Some of my friends also use GoToWebinar to collect clients for affiliate marketing. In those cases, they found some features were missing with respect to some of the competition. And the worst part is the price."
"GoToWebinar would be improved with the inclusion of support for video endpoints."
"I'd like Microsoft to start adding more AI functionality into Teams."
"The main issue is that the link goes down when there are internet issues."
"The solution should improve its user interface and recording features."
"If you talk about the tool's disadvantages, it consists of losing connection. It's also a problem that it only stores information for up to 40 days. The aforementioned areas can be considered for improvement."
"Inability to see large numbers of participants."
"The solution needs to be integrated with Microsoft Planner. I have also faced issues with stability in the first month."
"Sometimes, extracting the older version of a file takes a few minutes."
"They need to improve the scalability of Teams."
GoToWebinar is ranked 16th in Virtual Meetings with 8 reviews while Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews. GoToWebinar is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GoToWebinar writes "Video library is a great tool and it enables good customization; feels a little antiquated and rusty". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". GoToWebinar is most compared with Webex and GoToMeeting, whereas Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Bitrix24. See our GoToWebinar vs. Microsoft Teams report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.