We performed a comparison between Grafana and OmniPeek based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It excels in providing comprehensive details when there are downtimes or fluctuations, offering thorough reports."
"We like the alert features."
"It has good stability."
"The best thing about Grafana is the visualization. The colors and the ease of use make it very user-friendly."
"The installation process is easy. We have deployed it on the cloud. I have around 20 to 30 people using the solution in my company."
"Grafana has improved our analysis capability to solve an issue, increasing the co-working between IT services and business services."
"Great capacity planning and the solution has a great GUI."
"The initial setup is straightforward with just a few clicks on the solution's cloud."
"It's a solid piece of software. It's stable."
"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek was the ability it gave us to see the connection procedure."
"I believe the most crucial feature of OmniPeek search is the ability to sniff packets based on channel switching."
"The most valuable feature is OmniPeek is user-friendly."
"The most valuable features are the voice bot, which checks the quality of service for voice, and the expert view that gives me insight on what and where to troubleshoot."
"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek is the ability to assign custom color codes to the different packets easily."
"Lacks event management which affects our DevOps people."
"There are some areas of network drives that are not showing as expected based on server usage."
"Its UI features to create charts can also be improved. Some features could have a link to the documentation."
"Grafana doesn't provide anything for reporting."
"It would be helpful if Grafana provided more information and training on how to use Prometheus."
"Grafana need to improve the logging functionality."
"The product's configuration for saving files could be improved."
"There are not a lot of plugins for financial market monitoring."
"I would like to see the tool work in an open environment the same as how it does in a closed environment."
"The solution's automation has room for improvement."
"I would like to see the saving feature improved. We have had issues if you do not save your progress then you have to start from the beginning."
"I am not using OmniPeek for automation, we only do manual testing. Automation testing is tedious to do. The automation should be more user-friendly. I have exposed some APIs but the usage is not user-friendly."
"I don't see a clear roadmap in the future for improving this software."
"Making it more clear on how to configure the filters, or really automating them, would be an improvement."
Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews while OmniPeek is ranked 30th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews. Grafana is rated 8.0, while OmniPeek is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OmniPeek writes "Easy to identify packets, beneficial color assigning, and responsive support". Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Sentry, Azure Monitor, Elastic Observability and Dynatrace, whereas OmniPeek is most compared with LiveAction LiveNX, Colasoft Capsa and LogicMonitor. See our Grafana vs. OmniPeek report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.