We performed a comparison between Grafana and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Grafana has improved our analysis capability to solve an issue, increasing the co-working between IT services and business services."
"The initial setup is straightforward with just a few clicks on the solution's cloud."
"The solution has good features."
"Visualisation: It is easy to create beautiful, understanding graphs, snapshots to share the graphs with people who do not have access to Grafana, and templating to create powerful graphs."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the UI dashboard because we need to create a dashboard on Grafana to monitor our data."
"Great capacity planning and the solution has a great GUI."
"Kubernetes could help us to better visualize the trend of our data by recording and displaying our history over a chosen duration, such as the last 30 days."
"Almost any kind of visualization is possible with Grafana and all dashboards are configurable."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"Trigger limits are difficult to see in a graph."
"The documentation or training provided by Grafana is limited compared to its competitors, like Splunk."
"It would be helpful if Grafana provided more information and training on how to use Prometheus."
"Setting up alerts via Grafana is a bit complicated, and alerting needs to improve."
"The solution should include online support."
"Grafana need to improve the logging functionality."
"More dashboard is required, out-of-the-box, for OpenNMS."
"Its UI features to create charts can also be improved. Some features could have a link to the documentation."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
Earn 20 points
Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 76th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Grafana is rated 8.0, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Sentry, Azure Monitor, Elastic Observability and Dynatrace, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our Grafana vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.