We performed a comparison between HPE System Management and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Server Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a good product and I recommend it."
"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."
"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."
"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."
"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."
"It's a flexible solution."
"We are able to do problem determination on runaway processes."
"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."
"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."
"The integration with third-party tools and the alerts are most valuable."
"The product is very stable."
"The most valuable feature is the support for monitoring Cisco switches."
"We have found that Zabbix is more easy to use than other applications."
"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."
"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."
"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."
"I think that support integration could be improved."
"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."
"The only improvement I would suggest, revolves around its AI and ML capabilities."
"The user interface could be a bit better. They could update it a bit."
"An area for improvement would be the ease of doing aggregation from the value or different devices."
"I am having difficulties connecting it to Grafana, as well as some of the other plugins like Kibana."
"Having a more customizable interface and dashboard would be an improvement."
"The main problem with Zabbix is that you have to spend time writing templates for all of the products that you have."
"I would like to remotely connect to the computer, and Zabbix doesn't have this capability."
"Zabbix claims that there is an auto-discovery process but my team member was facing difficulty and was told that it's not really automatic, and there are some manual steps."
HPE System Management is ranked 19th in Server Monitoring with 8 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Server Monitoring with 101 reviews. HPE System Management is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE System Management writes " Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". HPE System Management is most compared with Lenovo XClarity Controller, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Amazon CloudWatch and SolarWinds NPM. See our HPE System Management vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.