We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"The tool is easy to manage."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"The performance is good."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"Very simple, very basic setup for Ubiquiti Wireless. Its performance in a home or small business setting with fewer access points is fantastic."
"We have not had an issue with Ubiquiti Wireless since we have been using it. The solution is highly reliable."
"Ubiquiti outdoor access points in particular, are really stable, and if there are no obstructions, Ubiquiti works well."
"We have found the product to be scalable."
"The setup is quite simple."
"Setting it up wasn't so complicated. It is reliable. Security-wise, we didn't have much trouble, but that could be due to our environment. We haven't had so many attacks, at least up till now."
"The most valuable feature of Ubiquiti Wireless is the ease of configuration."
"It has a user-friendly interface."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"The production is not very stable in our experience."
"Ubiquiti isn't as good for larger networks as any of the other wireless solutions. It lacks performance, coverage, and some of the advanced capabilities other solutions have."
"After upgrades to the interface, some features disappear."
"t does not have traffic shaping or traffic policies in its wireless requirements."
"This might not be the best solution for a very large organization."
"The cost is on the higher side and could be lower."
"Its stability could be better."
"We need an official distributor in Egypt as we don't have one right now."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.