We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and ManageEngine Log360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Customer service is very good and very helpful."
"Integrations are quite a useful and key feature of this solution. It has integration with the CVSS score, which is a central point for all the data and scores about the threats. There is an IBM Bluemix dashboard that is integrated with the CVSS score."
"Most of the features are good. It is an excellent solution."
"No doubt about it, the solution is extremely stable."
"I have used IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics in a Cloud Pak on Amazon, and there it runs on top of it and is easy to assess. Additionally, I have installed processes and characters."
"It does good correlation for events. It does good general analysis, and it has good apps as well."
"The ability to add extensions is the most valuable feature. For example, extensions that provide valuable test ports."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is how it monitors the real network. That is its leading security feature."
"You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."
"It is nice to be able to monitor and to have notifications."
"The Sharecon feature is the most valuable."
"The most valuable features for us are the application logs monitoring and the dashboard, which provides a single-pane view of all the ongoing activities."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is more secure than others, and there are more applications and features as well."
"ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy."
"The reporting is great. Everything you need is in the report for you already."
"The reports that you can run are really nice."
"The technical support is poor. Mostly because when I open a PMR for IBM, I am stuck with Level 1 staff. As an engineer, nothing that I am bringing them does not require Level 2 or Level 3 support."
"QRadar log integration of various applications can be a tough job at times. There may be occasions when you will not find any QRadar guide on adding logs of a particular application. Even if you come across one, adding a log process is not an easy one."
"The dashboards are all legacy and old."
"QRadar's performance has room for improvement because it cannot handle the volume. I need massive amounts of logs from various devices in our existing network architecture. IBM needs to improve QRadar's capacity to handle more logs."
"The architecture could be improved. I got stuck for a long time trying to understand the architecture, as it is quite challenging."
"IBM QRadar could improve the plugins and threat detection."
"We would like to see better instrumentation for debugging changes in the log flow."
"The price of IBM Security QRadar is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Most times log sheets are not assigned well."
"The matter of the data retention needs to be addressed."
"The solution lacks some features when compared to other products."
"It's difficult to find which conditions have been applied to a report because they are provided by default by ManageEngine. However, with other SIEMs if you want to create a report, they provide details, like which conditions are triggering certain reports. This needs to be there in ManageEngine. It would be good to know which parameter has been applied to the report that is updating the system."
"It is not expensive compared to other solutions."
"The integration with SharePoint and Teams should be improved."
"We can log in as a local user, and it's fine, but when we login with an Active Directory user, we cannot."
"Their technical support should be improved."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while ManageEngine Log360 is ranked 28th in Log Management with 15 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine Log360 is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Log360 writes "Facilitates incident backtracking and identifying the cause of incidents but insufficient intelligence-driven analysis to suppress unnecessary alerts". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas ManageEngine Log360 is most compared with ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Fortinet FortiSIEM and Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors, best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors, and best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.