We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."
"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."
"The feature that I have found most valuable with Splunk is the ability to sift through a bunch of data very quickly."
"The logs on the solution are excellent."
"Splunk Enterprise Security has helped speed up our security investigations."
"Its huge, versatile AppBase helped me to configure and bring data from different sources to a unified platform."
"With good domain knowledge, one can build almost anything. If you throw in Alert Manager or an integration with ServiceNow. Then, you have your own SIEM"
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the dashboard. It's very intuitive."
"Splunk Enterprise Security's dashboards are a key asset."
"Splunk allows us to customize processing and dashboards, which helps us take care of our customers' needs."
"The user interface was not good."
"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."
"The integration could be a bit better. They charge for certain integrations."
"Splunk can be an expensive solution. Technical support could be improved as well."
"Certain sections of the developer documentation could use some updating and clarification."
"Splunk could add more ways to manage archiving and storage. There isn't a web interface. You can do this on the SaaS version, but the on-premise platform doesn't have this option. It has other things but no option for remote NAS. I would like to have a personal web interface where I can specify how long logs should be stored. To have this readily available on the web, you need to adjust some settings on the backend. That is tricky."
"Splunk Enterprise Security is complicated in terms of developing specific cybersecurity use cases."
"The threat detection library needs to increase the frequency at which the playbooks are updated."
"Sometimes, there is latency in the logs."
"It works as intended for us, and we are getting everything that we need out of it. If anything, its initial setup can be improved a bit."
More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is ranked 55th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 251 reviews. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is rated 6.6, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager writes "Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is most compared with Dynatrace, IBM Application Performance Management and Azure Monitor, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, IBM Security QRadar, Dynatrace, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.