We performed a comparison between IIS and Oracle Fusion Middleware based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is the easiest way to publish applications which have been designed by older development tools."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use and easy to understand."
"We use Windows Server only for Eggplant Manager."
"The interface, simplicity, and ease of management are all good features that make this user-friendly."
"The solution is easy to use and connects with Microsoft."
"The solution has been reliable."
"It's very easy to publish."
"Oracle Fusion is stable."
"One good thing, which is a little bit common across all middleware products, is that you can build asynchronous as well as synchronous processes. The SOA part is where it can maintain your state for any state-full integrations. If you have failures, you can replay all that, which is a good part."
"The most valuable feature is the structure of the product. We use Oracle Fusion Middleware to manage the Oracle database. Registered users can go to each product if sign-on credentials match each user's identical framework."
"Data integrity."
"The most valuable features are Oracle Unified Directory and unified identity access management."
"The solution is extendable so you can start with two cores and add more at any time."
"The scalability is good."
"Oracle Service Bus is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"IIS's memory management could be improved."
"In the next release, I would like to see better integration between the cloud environment and the on-premises environment."
"We'd like future versions to be more stable."
"The solution is slow and could have better performance."
"The solution's black box is not fast."
"IIS needs to improve its security. Its support needs to be faster and clear. The tool's licensing could be cheaper as well."
"The areas of this solution that need improvement are monitoring, debugging, and troubleshooting."
"Occasionally, we encounter performance issues with IIS where it becomes unresponsive and requires a solution restart."
"An improvement for Oracle's Fusion Middleware could definitely be found in the SOA component. It's a heavyweight container and, if you ask me, if a product is available as a docker image where we can easily port it in to another Kubernetes platform, that would be perfect. But as for the current situation in the market, nobody is really willing to deploy this on premises."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware is based on the regulations in Saudi Arabia and the legislation changes. There is a need to be improvements all the time. It needs to adapt quickly in this market. Additionally, there could be some improvements in the construction sector."
"Technical support should resolve issues more quickly."
"Its price can be improved. We are currently looking for more cost-efficiency. It should also have a little bit more flexibility for customizations. The customizations should be quicker."
"The documentation might not be good enough for new users."
"I would rate the stability a nine out of ten because we did have multiple breakdowns and crashes."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware could improve by offering enhanced and customizable business-related features, particularly in supporting individual businesses or custom applications."
"The main improvement must be made on the user interface. You need to use another Oracle cross in this product. It must be improved and some features of the connectors must be changed."
IIS is ranked 4th in Application Server with 53 reviews while Oracle Fusion Middleware is ranked 6th in Application Server with 12 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Oracle Fusion Middleware is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Middleware writes "Maintains top database performance and includes a very good ATB feature". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and Windows Server AppFabric, whereas Oracle Fusion Middleware is most compared with Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, JBoss and TIBCO ActiveMatrix. See our IIS vs. Oracle Fusion Middleware report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.