We performed a comparison between Oracle Fusion Middleware and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fusion Middleware's main feature for me is that it is quite flexible, and, as middleware, it provides us with all sorts of technology and application adapters, which makes it very handy to use."
"The scalability is good."
"Data integrity."
"The solution is extendable so you can start with two cores and add more at any time."
"The solution is quite good for applying patches or performing upgrades."
"One good thing, which is a little bit common across all middleware products, is that you can build asynchronous as well as synchronous processes. The SOA part is where it can maintain your state for any state-full integrations. If you have failures, you can replay all that, which is a good part."
"The initial setup is easy. There are many self-tutorial videos are on the Internet, and then the Oracle documents are self-explanatory."
"Oracle Fusion is stable."
"The possibility of having several servers running, so we do not lose the service."
"It has good integration with security features, including OWASP."
"WebLogic is reliable, and it's easy to use for development."
"Another valuable feature is the ability to automate tasks through scripts, making our environment highly efficient."
"Helps in efficient load distribution"
"In the newer system, reconfigurability and the fact that it is easy to configure, make it very valuable."
"Oracle WebLogic Server is secure."
"The tool's technical support is very good."
"Its price can be improved. We are currently looking for more cost-efficiency. It should also have a little bit more flexibility for customizations. The customizations should be quicker."
"The price could always be better."
"An improvement for Oracle's Fusion Middleware could definitely be found in the SOA component. It's a heavyweight container and, if you ask me, if a product is available as a docker image where we can easily port it in to another Kubernetes platform, that would be perfect. But as for the current situation in the market, nobody is really willing to deploy this on premises."
"The main improvement must be made on the user interface. You need to use another Oracle cross in this product. It must be improved and some features of the connectors must be changed."
"The product should improve BPEL features."
"All areas of HCM modules could use some improvement."
"Technical support should resolve issues more quickly."
"Oracle Fusion Middleware could improve by offering enhanced and customizable business-related features, particularly in supporting individual businesses or custom applications."
"Oracle WebLogic Server's configuration could be improved because we need to do multiple configurations when setting up anything."
"There are always ways to improve. But it's getting better every time, with every new release, and every new patch, it's getting better."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server and other Oracle products has room for improvement because the pricing model isn't easy to understand. I'd like to see lower pricing from Oracle WebLogic Server. That's the main issue with the solution."
"The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files."
"In the future, I would like to see better support for the REST interface."
"The pricing is a little bit higher compared to other products."
"The error handling area in Oracle WebLogic Server is an area of concern where improvements are required."
Oracle Fusion Middleware is ranked 6th in Application Server with 12 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews. Oracle Fusion Middleware is rated 8.0, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Middleware writes "Maintains top database performance and includes a very good ATB feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". Oracle Fusion Middleware is most compared with Tomcat, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS, JBoss and TIBCO ActiveMatrix, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss, Oracle Application Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS. See our Oracle Fusion Middleware vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
