We performed a comparison between Ilex Sign&go and Microsoft Entra ID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The on-premises deployment meets restrictions and the end-user is able to control all the configuration in their own IT environment."
"The most valuable features of this solution are definitely the authorization and authentication, and the rule-based user validation."
"I like that you can run it on-premises. I also like that I can use Azure at any time as the main one."
"It is cloud based so it is always updated,"
"Conditional Access is a helpful feature because it allows us to provide better security for our users."
"It offers features that improve our security posture such as multifactor authentication, which is the second layer of protection that is used when we log into the cloud."
"The central authentication server is most valuable. GPOs are useful for user and computer policies."
"It's a quite comprehensive solution and it scales quite well within our required scale as well, which is very useful."
"Its ability to provide secure connections to people at all locations is the most valuable. It is mostly used by enterprises."
"There is no software as a service or PaaS (Platform as a Service) offering from Ilex. The only option is on-premises integration."
"Azure Active Directory could improve the two-factor authentication."
"Azure AD does not support legacy authentication protocols, such as NTLM or Kerberos."
"I had some issues with the Azure Active Directory on Windows XP. However, it worked well on Windows 7."
"I would like to see a better delegation of access. For instance, we want to allow different groups within the company to manage different elements of Azure AD, but I need more granularity in delegating access."
"There is no great solution in the cloud for Conditional Access authentication and RADIUS-type authentication."
"Adding a new account can be tricky."
"The custom role creation function could be improved as it's somewhat tricky to use."
"I think there is room for improvement with actually discussing, and advertising Microsoft as a an authenticator. Many people just get confused and use Google, and I think if Microsoft would make more of an effort to penetrate the market, that would be key."
Earn 20 points
Ilex Sign&go is ranked 25th in Single Sign-On (SSO) while Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 190 reviews. Ilex Sign&go is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Ilex Sign&go writes "Strong single sign on security comes packaged with simplicity in this on-premises-only solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA". Ilex Sign&go is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, whereas Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Ping Identity Platform and Okta Workforce Identity.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.