We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have definitely seen a return on our investment with the product."
"I would say that it is typically used by large-scale manufacturing industries, especially in discrete manufacturing, and it has proven to work brilliantly."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to handle products with up to 2,500 components, making it valuable for streamlining complex business operations."
"Infor LN has basically the same structure as CloudSuite Industrial, but LN has more advanced planning tools for manufacturing."
"The best thing about Infor LN is that you can use it for inter-company business and for international businesses, especially by mid-sized and big companies."
"Our clients appreciate the financial part of the solution, which is usually very complex. The Spanish localization is also very good."
"The most valuable features are manufacturing, and manufacturing costing modules. These are all powerful features of Infor LN."
"It has strong sales, purchase, warehousing, and logistics order management."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"The product has been stable so far."
"It’s a stable product."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"The solution’s performance could be improved."
"From a technical perspective, LN needs to work on customization and integration. It's fairly expensive for many clients to migrate from a customized private solution to the cloud. Infor needs to improve the cloud solution to make the migration from the on-prem customized solution faster and smoother. Otherwise, many clients will find it difficult or expensive to do."
"Regarding areas for improvement within the solution, I would say that the solution's asset management and quality management need attention."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"In general, the HR-related part of Infor LN doesn't work properly in Germany, making it an area that requires improvement."
"Only people who undergo training from the companies can learn about Infor products."
"From a customers' perspective, Infor LN covers most of the processes in the company, but sometimes, they have to choose other tools because of the functionality or the cost of the Infor solution. It covers the core functions of the company—such as financial, operations, logistics, and so on—very well, but it doesn't cover some parts such as invoices, digitization, etc."
"Infor LN has customer support in India, but service could be improved. So, basically, they prioritize agreements, and the number of tickets closed within a certain timeframe, not necessarily the quality or resolution of the tickets themselves. They just open and close them, sometimes without even understanding the issue. That's the biggest problem."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days."
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"They have the interface with Hubble and other reporting, however, we just want that to be a part of JD Edwards."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 25 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, PeopleSoft and IFS Cloud Platform. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.