We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perfect for our reporting for the management, workflow, and procurement workflow."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are financial reporting, procurement, and project management."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"It’s a stable product."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"The solution can scale."
"SAP is a very process controlled application. It does not allow users to manage the data. Once the initial process is set, it works smoothly."
"The most valuable feature of SAP ERP is the integration. It can be seamlessly integrated across the board."
"This product is very scalable and easy to expand."
"It gives us full control over each change, to the level of the individual field in a master record, including certificates."
"SAP ERP offers a wide range of functional modules, including payroll, HR, financials, and others."
"Everyone who uses SAP ERP has benefited from the functionality."
"The payroll solution and the localization for advances are valuable."
"The most valuable features of SAP ERP are the general operations. It has a good way to manage a business and do financial reporting. Overall we are happy with the robustness of the solution."
"It does not submit the inquiry as requested. We have to close the application and restart the computer."
"Needs better integration with IoT solutions."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."
"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."
"The implementation procedure could be simplified."
"Forms customization should be easier. Currently, it has to go through the development life cycle."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"The reporting could be improved, such as the casework, production, and activity reports. Our consultants in a subsidiary enterprise have requested that we develop a new production report. They could also improve production, financial, and HR analysis."
"It has a high cost."
"I believe there's room for improvement in terms of user experience."
"Could be more user friendly."
"I always prefer using an S/4HANA system."
"It's very difficult to find people who are well versed in it."
"License fees are too high."
"It could be more flexible, and the company should be able to adapt the system. Not the other way around. It's very rigid and difficult to change. Reporting could also be better."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, PeopleSoft, SAP S/4HANA and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and PeopleSoft. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
