We performed a comparison between Ivanti Endpoint Manager and VMware Workspace ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM).
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is having all our devices compliant with our policies."
"The device profiling which uses the official Outlook email enabled us to control the screenshot feature and prevent copying outside of the organization's application."
"For the price, the features included with Microsoft are appealing."
"There has been a noticeable increase in productivity for both my organization and clients."
"Being able to manage the devices remotely is most valuable. We can push security requirements through Microsoft Intune."
"Intune's security features for Apple iOS and Mac OS are helpful. We can check enrollment, manage public and private settings, and manage the organization's data using security key features."
"Intune provides full visibility into all active mobile device users. If their devices are noncompliant with our security policies, I have the flexibility to update them remotely."
"If you need only to load a specific profile and you don't have deep security functionalities, et cetera, Intune is very nice and good."
"Ivanti is a great product from a security perspective."
"The product enables us to access our internal applications from anywhere in the world."
"The most valuable feature of VMware Workspace ONE is its reliability."
"It was easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the security policies."
"It has good stability."
"If an end-user has an issue with a device, the administration has the ability to remote access the device after approval from the end-user."
"The platform makes the mobile device management process straightforward to handle."
"The initial setup is easy and the deployment doesn't take too long."
"A new Intune feature allows application packaging, but it incurs additional licensing costs for a significant number of applications."
"There is still a gap between SCCM and Intune, especially in the reporting, inventory, and software deployment areas."
"Intune should be much more granular in terms of supporting more Android cellular devices."
"It should be simplified. I've worked with many different mobile device management solutions, and Intune is one of the more complex ones. It could be more simplified, and some of it is related to the wording that is being used, such as a configuration profile versus a policy. They really should have had different names to make it less confusing."
"From a new user's perspective, it may be a little overwhelming because there are quite a few things to look at in the console, however, once you are sort of acclimated and are familiar with your core functions, it's fairly simple and straightforward."
"The reporting needs to be a bit more interactive."
"It just doesn't handle software updates well at all by itself. You need to be a scripting wizard to make those happen properly, or you use third-party tools. The Windows feature updates are very difficult to implement. I would like to see a proprietary built-in remote control tool. I know that they have Team Viewer integrated, but it is not seamless. It would be nice if they had a seamless remote desktop capability directly from the Intune console."
"The difficulty of the the roll out is surprisingly difficult considering this product is supposed to be an integrated part of the 365 suite."
"Setting up the solution on-premises is difficult and needs improvement."
"I would like to see some integration with native Microsoft products such as Anti-value."
"One of the things that I want them to improve on, if possible, is the management of Mac devices, MacBook Pro, for example. They do it, but they have scope for improvement, in my opinion. It's not that it's that bad, it just a small need."
"The solution is too complicated. A lot of end customers don't know how to start when they go into the console."
"It's not accurate enough when it comes to sending items to end-users."
"We're unhappy with the quality of support we get for it. We're unhappy with how upgrades occur, so we are migrating away from it. We have an on-premise AirWatch solution and for us to do upgrades we have to call AirWatch to be able to perform the upgrades. They're busy, and scheduling it is not timely enough for us."
"VMware Workspace ONE for the new users or the new clients that they try to procure and learn it, there can have difficulties. It does not have user-friendly portals. The portal seems to be more user-friendly in Microsoft solutions."
"The integration on the application side could improve."
"The portal is not user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Ivanti Endpoint Manager is ranked 15th in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 1 review while VMware Workspace ONE is ranked 2nd in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 82 reviews. Ivanti Endpoint Manager is rated 0.0, while VMware Workspace ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Endpoint Manager writes "Provides great security, especially for the finance industry". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Workspace ONE writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and offers single sign-on". Ivanti Endpoint Manager is most compared with Ivanti Avalanche, ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Citrix Endpoint Management, whereas VMware Workspace ONE is most compared with VMware Horizon, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Citrix Workspace.
See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors and best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
