We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."
"Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"The product has been stable so far."
"There are numerous good features."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"The financials are great."
"SAP S4HANA is a stable solution."
"I find everything I need in S4/HANA."
"It is the most stable solution provided by SAP and can be used on all levels."
"The most valuable feature is the detail in all of the processes. The solution captures our policies and enables us to implement our policies in SAP. There are different models that address our needs."
"Responsive, comprehensive and optimized solution."
"The in-memory processing capability is most valuable."
"Provides SAP Fiori apps with numerous dashboards and KPIs"
"Offers an excellent UI"
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"The initial setup was complex...One should get the end-user manual because, in some parts, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is not user-friendly."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."
"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."
"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"I haven't come across any downsides just yet."
"They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days."
"Technical support has been declining. They aren't as responsive as they used to be."
"There are some problems with the support provided for the solution, so it is not quite easy. It takes some time for them to offer us support."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"A virtual machine could exist to make everything available on a single deployment."
"I would like to see the AI included to help from a data standpoint."
"I'm not a big fan of SAP S/4HANA because it needs a lot of hardware. It is really fast, but it needs a lot of hardware. The hardware for S/4HANA is too expensive."
"MRP repost area should be improved. The production information report also needs to be improved."
"Thi solution can improve the Bill of Materials (BOM) and production planning."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 75 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, PeopleSoft and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Infor LN. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.