We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Vinyl and Salesforce Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's made things seamless and it's more efficient, and there's an audit trail where it wasn't there before."
"VINYL has really helped us speed up application development at a reasonable cost."
"It's like breaking apart coding and development into an ultra-configuration tool... It really is flexible."
"The fact that it's no-code is one of the most important features because it allows us to deliver very quickly. We can get the value to the business delivered much more quickly than with other solutions."
"You do not need to be a programmer to use it or build something in it."
"It is a platform which can grow with us and get us out of spreadsheets."
"VINYL works across different data sources. It is very useful to be able to map the data across different data sources and different environments. It is also very easy to develop small applications within a short span of time."
"The ZPM system enables us to organize projects and monitor their progress. The ease of logging into the VINYL app to test new features makes testing smoother, and we feel more involved in the creation of the app and its functions at every step of the way."
"What we like the most about it is the fact that it helps us track the record of our projects. It keeps everything on one interface, facilitating the operations and planning."
"Salesforce is a phenomenal application. It's very diverse."
"The Salesforce Platform's most valuable features are everything in one place, perfect reporting, highly customizable, and easy to receive information you need."
"I like the reports and the dashboards. Since I'm a managing partner, I use the reports and dashboards to understand my team's contact management, opportunity management, and account management activities. We use Pardot for marketing campaigns."
"The solution has plenty of features that are useful."
"It has definitely improved how we function."
"When compared to Siebel, the Salesforce Platform is easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is ease of use."
"I'd like to see the next release of VINYL have more user interface solutions to it, so that it could be a more user-friendly product on the front end for the customers that are utilizing the tool. We didn't have a solution to help automate all of our reporting in the past which identified the need to make sure that we could tap into our data sources and automate all of our reporting, which is exactly why we needed the tool."
"The interface has had a lot of changes to it. It is better than it was before. However, with the subqueries in particular, this has been the most difficult part of the interface."
"The documentation isn't everything it could be, and the user forum is not always the most helpful."
"I would like them to build out more tools for communication, particularly the ability to do a multinode panel via email."
"The features that I'd like to see in VINYL next would be the ability to have more control over, or have a rule-based control over column headings and column labels."
"When you are trying to delete certain columns or delete or drop tables, it will throw an error and it will force you to hunt down every location where those things are being referenced. You have to delete them from the very end and work your way backward... It would be easier, when you're deleting that table, if it would concatenate all the way down."
"Perhaps the UI could be improved."
"While some of the reporting functionality is adequate, reporting needs to continue to be worked on, given the fact that there are a lot of really good reporting tools out there."
"Integration needs improvement."
"It does need very specific resources to help deploy it and buy in from the users. It's one of those items it's pretty disruptive and if it's not deployed properly and if it doesn't get utilized efficiently, it won't be effective."
"Their reporting needs to be improved. It should be easier. I don't know how, but it needs to be easier."
"There is always room for improvement. It can be hard to learn, but when you have somebody who is experienced in this, it is like anything else. It is like Excel, you'll never know everything about Excel, but there's somebody who would possibly know. I'm sure I don't know all of the ins and outs of Salesforce."
"The solution's UI is horrible."
"It is quite expensive. It has gotten to that point where it is a lot more pricey. It has kind of got its own proprietary language for development. It is probably never going to change, but if it had a more market language for development, it would be easier to find developers. They come at a premium cost, so it is expensive."
"Areas of improvement can be around Engagement of Customers feature and approvals of transactional records."
"I think the search needs to be improved so as to allow for a broader keyword search."
Jitterbit Vinyl is ranked 20th in Rapid Application Development Software with 31 reviews while Salesforce Platform is ranked 9th in Rapid Application Development Software with 82 reviews. Jitterbit Vinyl is rated 8.8, while Salesforce Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Vinyl writes "Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Salesforce Platform writes "Reliable with good reporting and custom dashboards". Jitterbit Vinyl is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems and QuickBase, whereas Salesforce Platform is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Microsoft Azure, Appian and ServiceNow. See our Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Salesforce Platform report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors, best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors, and best No-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.