We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert and Trellix Active Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature is Endpoint's management."
"We can scale the solution."
"We compared Kaspersky and Trend Micro. The latter is significantly more expensive. That's the main difference."
"We've found the solution to be stable."
"The most valuable features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response are all the features. The features have all helped us and most recently malware has been an issue in our company and malware protection has been effective."
"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky EDR is its simplicity. The console is easy to use and not very complex."
"Has great behavior detection and a very good firmware scanner."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"We are hoping to automate detection and response and take advantage of user behavior analytics, given that we are working from home. About half of our workers are still remote, so Active Response gives us that visibility and lets us automate a number of those events."
"It's a little lighter compared to the older version, which was mostly signature-based."
"The solution is scalable."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"Detections could be improved."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"There is a problem with the solution, it came from Russia and we are looking for a replacement."
"The technical support team should respond in a more timely manner."
"There are some issues with EDR's web policy blocking sites that are marked as exceptions."
"The solution does not offer much support to its users in Spanish, so I would like to see them offer more support in Spanish."
"They should include XDR features in the solution."
"The solution could always be more secure."
"I am not happy with Kaspersky's support since basic support is very cool unless you pay for some advanced support, in which you get better responses and feedback from Kaspersky's team."
"I would like to integrate Kaspersky with my Log Collector SIEM. Right now that's not possible."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
"While the product is good, we are currently facing support issues."
"There are some components on the cloud that should also reside in the on-prem deployment models but don't."
"I also expected Active Response 's user interface to be much more analytical."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 18th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews while Trellix Active Response is ranked 58th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2, while Trellix Active Response is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Active Response writes "Lighter with good stability and pretty good technical support". Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet, IBM Security QRadar and Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, whereas Trellix Active Response is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). See our Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Trellix Active Response report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.