We compared Trend Micro Deep Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: Trend Micro Deep Security is praised for its patch management feature and comprehensive security options. However, it needs improvement in pricing, technical support, and various functionalities. On the other hand, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is commended for its user-friendly interface and strong security protection. Suggestions for enhancements include documentation, compatibility, and performance. The pricing and licensing for both products are considered average or on the expensive side, depending on the user's perspective. The customer service and support for both products have received mixed reviews, with some users finding them satisfactory and others mentioning room for improvement.
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"It has improved our performance and deployment."
"I like how it protects the network and all the endpoints."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the application control is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the management center."
"The solution is very easy to use. It's an extremely user-friendly product."
"There is plenty of features that make the solution work very well."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Setting up Kaspersky is easy, but it requires two or three core members from our team, including admins and managers if necessary. And that is because of the administration that I mentioned."
"It integrates well with the cloud; for example, AWS, and Google Cloud Provider."
"The vulnerability scanning reduces false positives by quite a bit."
"There is a degree of set it and forget it in regards to the actual endpoints and what you can do with the console, which is nice."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the virtual path function, which is the reason we chose to implement it."
"It serves its purpose and works well."
"I like the anti-malware features."
"Support and threat prevention are the most valuable features of this solution."
"Deep Security provides us with a lot of reassurance about security threats. You don't have to worry about a patch not being there in the software. You're confident that all the patches and vulnerabilities are taken care of."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"As far as improvements, maybe the licensing could be cheaper, but I think this solution is pretty okay."
"I think it would be good for them to consider and cloud integration capabilities."
"When it comes to handling the expiration of licenses, the solution should give a company more time to set up a renewal. It happens too abruptly right now."
"The product must improve its price to suit small and mid-size enterprises."
"When I do a malware scan on my computer it takes a long while. This process could improve in the future. Additionally, the security could improve."
"The licensing fees could be reduced."
"It's does not have the architecture or structure to scale up."
"We would like to know where attacks are coming from."
"I would like to see an EDR function for the servers, as that would be useful for us."
"In the solution, servers often go offline for various reasons, requiring us to manually check the cause or issue, such as connectivity issues, and to find out why the agent went offline."
"Pricing is on the expensive side and could be more affordable. The technical support for Trend Micro Deep Security also needs improvement."
"I've not worked with CrowdStrike Falcon, but one of our customers also had CrowdStrike Falcon on some of the devices. I was only supporting Trend Micro. They had a ransomware attack, but Trend Micro didn't detect that particular ransomware attack, whereas CrowdStrike did."
"We'd like to have more application control."
"The setup is fairly complex. The deployment took around two months."
"When implementing this solution, sometimes we have challenges with SQL migration."
"It would be helpful if they could send emails notifying their users about the recommended upgraded versions to address the newly discovered vulnerabilities."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 111 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "High availability, effective VPM, and responsive support". Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Fortinet FortiClient, CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.