We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup of Katalon Studio was easy."
"The basic framework and project organization is very good."
"It provides us daily feedback on the status (failing/working) of the core features of our websites."
"Video capture on failure is a must have. A picture is worth a thousand words. A video is worth a thousand pictures (literally)."
"It is a good tool and provides all the essential features for our business requirements."
"The most valuable feature of Katalon Studio is that everything can be managed from one platform."
"The tool has a good record and playback feature for functionality, which saves time when creating automated tests."
"The best thing about the solution is that there is a record and playback functionality."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"The debugging feature is valuable."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"It is a good and user-friendly tool."
"The product’s regression testing time could be reduced."
"They need to work on documentation to make it more centralized and easier to find what you are looking for."
"The free version of the solution is not user friendly at all."
"We would like to see improved integration with various reporting tools; this would make our testing data more complete."
"Katalon lacks integration with other software, including integrating other languages like .NET and PHP."
"The product is comparatively slow."
"We have had some issues when it comes to stability, which is something that needs to be improved."
"Support options need improvement. It is sometimes hard to find a solution to any given problem, thus you are forced to use another solution."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
"The performance could be faster."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"Sometimes, the solution hangs, so its performance could be improved."
"Over the years, I haven't identified any specific enhancements that I desire; Visual Studio has consistently met my requirements seamlessly and flawlessly."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Katalon Studio is ranked 3rd in Regression Testing Tools with 42 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes " Functional automation features and the recording functionality saves time but the performance and script execution is slow ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Testim and Appium, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise. See our Katalon Studio vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.