We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The tool is very easy to set up and get running."
"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations."
"Creating the script is very easy and user friendly."
"It is also good for reporting purposes, which would be most familiar for QC and UFT users."
"The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily."
"The solution offers helpful guidelines and has good documentation."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly."
"With LoadRunner Enterprise, doing various types of performance testing, load testing, and automation testing has been very helpful for some of the teams."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"Visual Studio is the easiest to use."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable."
"They need to focus on minimizing the cost."
"The cost of the solution is high and can be improved."
"Currently, when we try open LRE we encounter cookie banner issues. However, I'm not sure if it is within the enterprise solution or with the vendors."
"OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise needs to improve reporting."
"The solution is expensive."
"For such an experienced team as mine, who have been with the product for over ten years, sometimes working with technical support is not that easy."
"The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet."
"The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and by including autocorrelation capability."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"Over the years, I haven't identified any specific enhancements that I desire; Visual Studio has consistently met my requirements seamlessly and flawlessly."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The documentation is limited."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 81 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText Silk Performer, Tricentis NeoLoad and OpenText UFT One, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.