We performed a comparison between McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has features that helped improve the security posture of our clients. It provides the ability to correlate a large variety of log sources very cost-effectively, especially for Microsoft sources."
"The machine learning and artificial intelligence on offer are great."
"Sentinel also enables you to ingest data from your entire ecosystem and not just from the Microsoft ecosystem. It can receive data from third-party vendors' products such firewalls, network devices, and antivirus solutions. It's not only a Microsoft solution, it's for everything."
"The solution offers a lot of data on events. It helps us create specific detection strategies."
"We can use Sentinel's playbook to block threats. It covers all of the environment, giving us great visibility."
"The log query feature has been the most valuable because it's very good. You can put your data on the cloud and run queues from Sentinel. It will do it all very fast. I love that I don't have to upload it to an Excel file and then manually look for a piece of information. Sentinel is much faster and is good for big databases."
"There are a lot of things you can explore as a user. You can even go and actively hunt for threats. You can go on the offensive rather than on the defensive."
"It's pretty powerful and its performance is pretty good."
"We get fewer false positives than with other solutions."
"The valuable feature of the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is the management of the policies."
"From a single dashboard, I can take a look at several things including the endpoint protection, the file integrity section, the data activity monitor, and more."
"Application control and traffic encryption are the most valuable features."
"McAfee is helping us to clean all of the viruses from the machines, protecting our desktops from the latest threats."
"If you set it up right, it can really manage a very complex environment which require fine tuning where there are a lot of exceptions. That's what it caters to. It can just do those specifics in those exceptional situations, which is good."
"The most valuable feature of the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is agent communication."
"It is a scalable solution...I rate its scalability a nine out of ten."
"Trend Micro has improved my client's organization by recovering malware disabled network adaptors from servers."
"None of the Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention features worked well, but the solution had a straightforward setup."
"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"We find the initial setup to be very easy."
"It is a scalable product."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"We find the malware scanning and intrusion detection most valuable for our server management requirements. We can find out who is on our servers and what they have done."
"The interface and dashboard are okay."
"I believe one of the challenges I encountered was the absence of live training sessions, even with the option to pay for them."
"Sentinel's reporting is complex and can be more user-friendly."
"For certain vendors, some of the data that Microsoft Sentinel captures is redacted due to privacy reasons."
"Its implementation could be simpler. It is not really simple or straightforward. It is in the middle. Sometimes, connectors are a little bit complex."
"Sentinel still has some anomalies. For example, sometimes when we write a query for log analysis with KQL, it doesn't give us the data in a proper way... Also, the fields or columns could be improved. Sometimes, it is not giving the desired results and there is a blank field."
"There is some relatively advanced knowledge that you have to have to properly leverage Sentinel's full capabilities. I'm thinking about things like the creation of workbooks, how you do threat-hunting, and the kinds of notifications you're getting... It takes time for people to ramp up on that and develop a familiarity or expertise with it."
"One key area that can be improved is by building a strong integration with our XDR platform."
"When it comes to ingesting Azure native log sources, some of the log sources are specific to the subscription, and it is not always very clear."
"As for improvements, I think that putting everything on a cloud and one console would be a great idea and would be useful for customers."
"There needs to be support for Mac computers. Currently, McAfee does not work on iOS."
"We would like to see more integration with different platforms and extend this to other platforms. We are migrating to the cloud and want to extend it from our on-premises setup to the cloud."
"The installation process is quite difficult and requires technical support."
"The detection aspect should be improved so that signatures are updated more quickly."
"While there are bugs and a few functionality issues, it is just a matter of raising them with the support team. However, support is part of the problem as well. You want everything to be seamless in a perfect world, but the support is spread across different countries. They have Level 1, 2, and 3. Level 1 is most likely in a developing country. They don't provide the best service."
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator should improve its integration with other tools."
"The issues with the integration capabilities of the product, specifically the ones that are deployed on an on-premises model, need to be improved."
"Being able to specify an agent list, or client list, to allow support from outside of the organization, would be of benefit to this solution."
"Having more features apart from what the product was designed for is what I'd like to see in its next release."
"Most of the functions don't work in the way that they are supposed to."
"They could improve the product's data loss policies."
"The platform's support structure for government-specific domain requirements could be improved."
"The tool should improve its reporting functionality. We need a proper reporting feature in a DLP solution."
"Within the solution, many of the functions do not perform as intended...It is not a stable solution...It is not a scalable solution."
"I would like to provide improved network direction in order to regulate all of the user agents. We only use Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention to manage various threats and malicious user agents currently."
More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 39 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 13th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 6.2. The top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Useful agent communication, reliable, but lacking support for microservices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Good for data blocking and security, content categorization, and generating accessibility reports ". McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with Splunk SOAR, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler DLP, Elastic Security and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Trellix DLP. See our McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
