We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and TIBCO Cloud Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a nine out of ten, with ten being easy to set up."
"It's quite similar to Power Optima, but I use it mainly to integrate with databases, and it works well for that purpose."
"The prebuilt connectors available for SAP are really useful."
"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature."
"We mainly used it to integrate SAP, ServiceNow, and different third-party APIs with the front end."
"The product's most valuable feature is scalability."
"I am really impressed by TIBCO's integration of any level of complexity."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"I like that it is a very good integration tool with many other things. TIBCO is very good for cloud integration"
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better."
"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."
"The stability of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is stable. However, we have had some issues in the past. They do resolve issues that arise from new releases."
"There could be custom code for the product's components."
"It can be a bit challenging to use."
"Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms like SharePoint or Salesforce. Due to security constraints, some users may prefer not to use these connectors. Instead, they might opt for the HTTP connector."
"Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it."
"Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement."
"The deployment was rather complicated."
"Integrations could be better. Although integration is good, we have faced some block issues."
"TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex."
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews while TIBCO Cloud Integration is ranked 17th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 3 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while TIBCO Cloud Integration is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO Cloud Integration writes "A product that is easy to install and offers good stability to users". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi iPaaS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Jitterbit Harmony , whereas TIBCO Cloud Integration is most compared with Azure Data Factory and SAP Process Orchestration. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.