We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One special aspect of Azure Logic Apps is its easy integration of various applications, especially when connectors are already available. For instance, there are connectors for database applications and systems like SAP. You can drag and drop the connectors to complete your integration quickly."
"We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."
"The solution has plenty of good valuable features and a plethora of services."
"The product has efficient connectors."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are the triggering based on certain events. You can trigger a Logic App and put your logic behind it and take certain actions. The actions could be anything based on the business logic. For example, if you say something happens, an order comes in, and the order can sit in one of the Azure services. Whenever an order comes in, the Logic App can go look and trigger an event. You can write your logic inside your Logic App and it works similar to a workflow."
"The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment."
"If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous."
"The solution's best feature is that it is compatible with the cloud and has many connectors and third-party adapters."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its performance."
"The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us"
"The OIC is very good."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service is a really good product and the ROI is very good with it. It lowers development time. A development cycle that may have taken a year without Oracle Integration Cloud Service can drop down to three or four months with it."
"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."
"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."
"We wanted to use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, but we faced a timeout."
"The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services."
"The solution should include more connectors."
"Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms like SharePoint or Salesforce. Due to security constraints, some users may prefer not to use these connectors. Instead, they might opt for the HTTP connector."
"It can be a bit challenging to use."
"The standard logic app could be simplified. Thats what we would like to see in the next release."
"Lacks features for more complex integrations."
"The bulk processing needs improvement."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM."
"Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define."
"There are a few features that we noticed are not in the cloud. There are some improvements needed. One example is the graphical user interface that needs to improve, it could be easier to use."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi iPaaS, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.