We performed a comparison between Microsoft BitLocker and OpenText Connected MX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Mobile Data Protection."Microsoft BitLocker's most valuable features are stability and simplicity in terms of usage."
"The most valuable feature is the simplicity and integration with the Microsoft Clouds platform."
"The solution works the way it's supposed to - stability and scalability are fine."
"The most valuable feature is the authentication process which is very fast."
"The tool is stable."
"It's very straightforward to recover data. It's safe for us; in case of lost information, it provides multiple options to recover the data."
"It's a straightforward solution for encryption."
"One significant aspect is that without the BitLocker key, you can't log in to the user's laptop. I appreciate the capability to encrypt the user's hard drive, ensuring access only with the recovery key. In an enterprise setup, we store all BitLocker keys on our server. So, whenever a user attempts to log in, the architecture authenticates with the key. This ensures that our data is secure. Even if the user's laptop is lost, we have confidence that the data remains inaccessible. So far, our user data is well-protected."
"The integration features are the most valuable. The integration is specific to each solution. It works well with SQL and Oracle databases and so on."
"The migration itself is a nightmare."
"More customization options would have been nice, such as password selection, actions when the screen is locked, etc."
"The deployment process regarding prerequisites and automation could be easy to understand."
"The primary aspect for improvement lies in expanding our developer base, which would accelerate the development process and bring these enhancements to fruition"
"The solution lacks the ability to allow its user to provide limited access to someone."
"I would like to be able to encrypt our cloud tenancy."
"I often have to make multiple attempts to log in."
"The reporting in Microsoft is very minimal."
"On the exchange server, you do not have the best options for adjusting your mailbox. This feature is not included. Also, disaster recovery backups can be improved. Some other solutions, such as HP Data Protector, have more features."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft BitLocker is ranked 1st in Mobile Data Protection with 61 reviews while OpenText Connected MX is ranked 9th in Mobile Data Protection. Microsoft BitLocker is rated 8.2, while OpenText Connected MX is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft BitLocker writes "A solution that prevents unauthorized access and goes beyond security measures to provide protection to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Connected MX writes "The primary function of it is to back it up off-site so that if you ever have any kind of data corruption, data loss, that you can easily recover that data". Microsoft BitLocker is most compared with ESET Endpoint Encryption, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption and WinMagic SecureDoc, whereas OpenText Connected MX is most compared with .
See our list of best Mobile Data Protection vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Data Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.