We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra ID and Omada Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Identity Management (IM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Azure AD has features that have helped improve our security posture."
"We haven't had any problems with stability. Everything works fine."
"The portal version of the Azure active directory is pretty robust."
"Overall, I think the support and the pictorial format of this web portal are very good."
"It has given us the ability to be able to establish single sign-on identities in which we can establish credentials no matter where we are, whether it is on-premises or in the cloud, in a hybrid cloud, or in an additional connection from another cloud where we share equipment or host."
"The most valuable features in Active Directory are the password writeback product and the MDM technology."
"It's a very scalable solution."
"It's very easy to run and it's part of their ecosystem and I don't think it's going anywhere anytime soon."
"The teams we work with at Omada provide great insights and support. Overall, it has been a pleasure working with them. That's the part we value the most."
"The most valuable aspects of Omada Identity for me are the automation capabilities."
"The customer success and support teams have been crucial."
"Omada offers a technical solution that addresses both our needs."
"The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology."
"The most valuable feature of Omada is its API connectivity, which allows seamless integration with various services like SAP, GRC, and Microsoft licenses."
"When we started with identity and access management, we cleaned up and skipped 500 accounts. Therefore, there are a lot of people who are still in our system. Using this tool, we have cleaned up a lot of accounts for ourselves as well as our partners and suppliers. So, we can manage everything now."
"The Governance and self-service that can be set up so you can use them yourself to work in the system are the most valuable features. End users can be enabled to help themselves."
"In terms of stability, sometimes the more applications you integrate, the more it becomes a little bit unstable."
"Many of the features are outdated, so the UI and UX could be improved."
"The synchronization between my AD and Azure AD needs improvement."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"I would like to see a better delegation of access. For instance, we want to allow different groups within the company to manage different elements of Azure AD, but I need more granularity in delegating access."
"The cost of licensing always has room for improvement."
"One thing that they need to improve is the cost."
"One area where it can improve is connectivity with other systems. Not all systems are connected and you have to do coding to establish a point of connectivity. It supports certain vendors and it supports certain protocols. It is limited in many other aspects at the attribute level."
"If I had to name one thing, it would be the user interface (UI)."
"What I would most like to see added to the product is role management, especially enterprise or business role management, and the processes around that."
"The account management integration isn't bad, but it isn't plug-and-play like Microsoft Azure. You need some deep development knowledge to set up the connectors."
"The security permission inside Omada needs improvement. It's tricky to set up."
"There is room for improvement in Omada's integration capabilities, particularly in streamlining complex integrations and enhancing programming logic for better rule management."
"Functionality and usability could be improved."
"Omada could make it a bit more convenient to send emails based on events automatically. Having that functionality is critical for us to maintain transparency."
"It is not possible to customize reports on Omada Identity."
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Identity Management (IM) with 190 reviews while Omada Identity is ranked 4th in Identity Management (IM) with 46 reviews. Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6, while Omada Identity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Omada Identity writes "The solution has sped up employee onboarding while reducing manual work". Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Ping Identity Platform and Okta Workforce Identity, whereas Omada Identity is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt, One Identity Manager, SAP Identity Management and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Omada Identity report.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
