We performed a comparison between Microsoft MDS and TIBCO EBX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to install."
"Technical support is very good."
"It is very easy to deploy and provision a machine."
"Compared to other databases, it is easier to manage and administer."
"One of the main features I have found useful is the integration with Azure active directory."
"The most valuable feature is the administration console."
"Unlike specialized tools, MDS is adaptable for various industries, making it a versatile choice for master data management."
"The backup and restore functionality are the solution's most valuable aspects."
"The data quality is very good."
"This solution allows the user to have complete control, and is 100% customizable."
"It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The data modeling is very good."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are the workflow and interface."
"There are a lot of possible use cases for this Master Data Management tool."
"The product is extremely flexible."
"The initial setup is easy and straightforward."
"The Microsoft license cost could be lower."
"More generic related things can be included in the services."
"From my understanding, MS, as of 2021, will not maintain the product going forward."
"In the next version, I would like to see integration with Azure."
"The stability could be improved."
"Stability can be fragile at times. If you are not attentive or make a mistake, it can cause problems."
"The program's navigation tools could be improved."
"The solution could be better integrated into Microsoft's other products."
"The support isn't great and takes too long. And the pricing can be improved."
"The design should be easier and more visual."
"We would like to see the community an documentation for this solution be developed. At present there is very little tutorial documentation available, and limited community support for issues with the product."
"Currently, users can't use Plain SQL queries in TIBCO EBX."
"The product does not scale well horizontally. We find the scalability to be quite inferior to other options."
"Everything is updated through forms, and working with UI web forms. It's more record-based processing. It is not mass-based processing. This is one of the things that are not good for TIBCO EBX. Another problem is we cannot join tables and prepare a view where the tables are joined. Someone can code it but it is not a feature of the solution without code. You have to take data from a table, combine it with data from another table and then present it. This could be done better."
"The documentation needs improvement."
"TIBCO EBX could improve by making the building of rules less complex and the repository is not robust."
Microsoft MDS is ranked 2nd in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 20 reviews while TIBCO EBX is ranked 3rd in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 14 reviews. Microsoft MDS is rated 7.6, while TIBCO EBX is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft MDS writes "Useful Excel plug-in, good scalability, and good integration with SQL Server and other Microsoft products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO EBX writes "Good workflow models and pull-down lists with very good data modeling". Microsoft MDS is most compared with Informatica MDM, SAP Master Data Governance, Profisee, Reltio Cloud and Oracle Data Relationship Management, whereas TIBCO EBX is most compared with Informatica MDM, SAP Master Data Governance, Reltio Cloud, Stibo STEP MDM and Informatica PIM. See our Microsoft MDS vs. TIBCO EBX report.
See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.
We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.