We performed a comparison between SAP Master Data Governance and TIBCO EBX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Master Data Management (MDM) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is an all-around good product."
"Some of the features that I have found to be beneficial are the search and uploads functions."
"The data capturing and data governance features are valuable."
"The scalability is very good."
"A good solution for large enterprises."
"It is a stable solution."
"We've found the solution to be quite flexible."
"The ability to identify and manage duplicate data is valuable. The solution automatically checks for duplication possibilities based on criteria like name matching."
"The data quality is very good."
"There are a lot of possible use cases for this Master Data Management tool."
"This solution allows the user to have complete control, and is 100% customizable."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are that is a complete tool and everything can be done inside, including data governance. We are able to model everything according to the needs of the company. If the company needs five people to agree to a change in data, they can do it with TIBCO EBX. They can model it with any particular rules. Additionally, there is dynamic data modeling, simple workflows using the GUI that comes from the server."
"The data modeling is very good."
"The product is extremely flexible."
"The most valuable features of TIBCO EBX are the workflow and interface."
"The tool's UI is good and easy to understand."
"Lacks some features that are available in other solutions."
"The multidomain MDM feature is based on EIP systems, which may not be a good model for all master data."
"The price can be improved."
"The implementation could be easier."
"The profiling feature, especially for materials, needs improvement. We faced challenges maintaining specific details for a single material from multiple vendors."
"The user experience can be improved."
"The solution lacks some flexibility."
"In general, I want artificial intelligence added to SAP Master Data Governance since I feel it is one of the areas where the solution has certain shortcomings."
"The product does not scale well horizontally. We find the scalability to be quite inferior to other options."
"The support isn't great and takes too long. And the pricing can be improved."
"In terms of improvements that this solution needs, it should support big data."
"Currently, users can't use Plain SQL queries in TIBCO EBX."
"The documentation needs improvement."
"The initial setup can be a bit complex."
"We would like to see the community an documentation for this solution be developed. At present there is very little tutorial documentation available, and limited community support for issues with the product."
"The design should be easier and more visual."
SAP Master Data Governance is ranked 1st in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 23 reviews while TIBCO EBX is ranked 3rd in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 14 reviews. SAP Master Data Governance is rated 7.8, while TIBCO EBX is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP Master Data Governance writes "Provides efficient technical support services, but it could be more affordable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO EBX writes "Good workflow models and pull-down lists with very good data modeling". SAP Master Data Governance is most compared with Informatica MDM, Microsoft MDS, Reltio Cloud, IBM InfoSphere MDM and Semarchy xDM, whereas TIBCO EBX is most compared with Informatica MDM, Reltio Cloud, Stibo STEP MDM, Semarchy xDM and Microsoft MDS. See our SAP Master Data Governance vs. TIBCO EBX report.
See our list of best Master Data Management (MDM) Software vendors.
We monitor all Master Data Management (MDM) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.