We performed a comparison between Microsoft Purview Data Governance and SAP Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies."
"The data lineage feature stands out. It tracks where the data comes from and any changes made."
"MIP also provides strong information rights management settings, such as the ability to specify who has access to content and at what time."
"The most valuable aspect of Purview is its PowerShell connectivity, enabling automation."
"Data segregation is the most valuable feature."
"The cataloging tool is definitely the most valuable... It tells you about all the data you have in your tables, which helps people understand our data. We now know what data we have."
"The e-discovery search is useful."
"It is very easy to learn the interface, and it is very user-friendly."
"The new workflow engine is based on the web app rather than the Java-based approach."
"It is robust solution."
"We've had a few issues with the scanner. It runs perfectly one day, and on another day, it will run the whole night. It's probably related to the rules. If I set some compliance rules and apply the rules to any column, I can't delete it. I have to disable it and reactivate it."
"There are some limitations with regard to the lineage of data from different parts of the system."
"Microsoft Purview's compliance processes for handling various Mac and iOS devices could be significantly improved."
"Data quality has been a highly requested feature among customers."
"I would like to have AI functionality on the dashboard to help me analyze and report on the data that we capture using Purview on a daily basis."
"The custom data classification for the African region needs to be improved."
"Purview's data loss prevention for macOS endpoints has some limitations, and the end-user experience of recovering from a failure is lacking."
"We have had a lot of issues since we moved to Unified Support. There have been work gaps there, and we believe they fixed them, but we need to make sure that they are going to be sustainable. It is to be seen."
"SAP should come up with specialized services as per their customer's requirements."
"I would like to see harmonizing with some of the external third-party products so that it will all be within SAP."
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is ranked 1st in Data Governance with 51 reviews while SAP Data Governance is ranked 22nd in Data Governance with 2 reviews. Microsoft Purview Data Governance is rated 7.8, while SAP Data Governance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Data Governance writes "User friendly with good documentation but needs to cover more non-Microsoft use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Data Governance writes "A robust solution that establishes rules, policies, and procedures". Microsoft Purview Data Governance is most compared with Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon and Microsoft Entra ID, whereas SAP Data Governance is most compared with Informatica Axon and Alation Data Catalog. See our Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. SAP Data Governance report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
