We performed a comparison between MongoDB and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."It is convenient to use because we can do manipulations with the JSON data that we get. There are also a lot of joins and associations with MongoDB, which makes it easy to use for us."
"We can define security rules at the database level or the cluster level to grant or deny access to particular users."
"We haven't had any issues with stability."
"The solution's most important aspect is its seamless database."
"I like the document storage feature. It's pretty simple."
"It's easy to add and remove things in MongoDB. You can alter the tables. MongoDB is faster at reading, slower at writings."
"Its flexibility, and cost. It is reasonably priced."
"It can handle a lot of files quickly."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The tool performs well."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"Data encryption is possible using third-party tools but they should have their own encryption capability built-in to this solution."
"MongoDB is a very useful and convenient choice, but sometimes for more complex projects, there are certain niche requirements that appear, so using a different tool could be beneficial. It raises the complexity of the architecture, but it could be beneficial to the world, the features, the ease of the features which are being implemented."
"It would be good to have scalability for clusters. For example, if we have three clusters, we should be able to increase to five clusters if required. I am not sure if such a feature is currently there. I hope there is good documentation for this."
"The performance can be improved."
"MongoDB should not be used for reporting, analytics, or number-crunching tasks."
"I think that MongoDB's search engine should be improved."
"The product's data consistency could be more efficient than traditional SQLs."
"The performance of the solution could be improved."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"The installation is difficult."
"The licensing model is bad."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 70 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. MongoDB is rated 8.2, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Oracle Berkeley DB, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with Cassandra, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Aerospike Database 7.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.