We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and SAP Process Orchestration based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: When choosing a Business-to-Business Middleware tool Mule Anypoint Platform slightly nudges ahead of SAP Process Orchestration. PeerSpot users feel Mule Anypoint Platform can help organizations simplify the development of products and increase productivity. The solution provides a valuable API toolkit and intuitive monitoring capabilities. Many users feel SAP Process Orchestration should be more scalable and user friendly.
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"The platform's cloud integration capabilities are good."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"The main benefit is that the solution is low maintenance. Moreover, it's the license cost is very low because it's part of the package. The maintenance is standard maintenance. And the updates are regular. So there's a regular update and you can choose whether you want to do those updates or not."
"The solution is stable."
"Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity."
"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."
"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."
"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten."
"SAP Process Orchestration is middleware where we are able to manage and interact with everything from a single location. One of the most beneficial areas is monitoring which is very easy because it is all in one place. There are many adapters added recently that can be used for new functionality. The solution is easy to operate and it is more mature than the cloud solution provided by SAP."
"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"It should give better control over account management."
"The inclusion of GenAI in the tool can be good since it is an area that is currently unavailable in the solution."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."
"It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development."
"It is scalable, but there can be performance issues with high data volume or traffic, especially during month ends."
"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."
"We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters."
"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."
"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 41 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, IBM B2B Integrator and IBM App Connect. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
