We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle Integration Cloud Service (OIC) based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Mule Anypoint slightly nudges ahead of Oracle Integration Platform in this comparison, as Mule Anypoint offers very good API management. Users can easily define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them as desired. OIC’s payload and file polling limitations are some of the features that prevent the solution from being more competitive in the marketplace.
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"The ability to define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them is a fantastic platform feature."
"The product’s ability to seamlessly translate protocols is great."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"People are able to scale up, learn it quickly, and start delivering."
"The dashboard provided by Oracle Integration Cloud for monitoring and error handling is very intuitive."
"The out-of-box integration between Oracle and SAP is really beneficial"
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service integrates well and is user-friendly. If you are not a developer or ops engineer you can still use the solution with ease. You do not need to have developers' knowledge, you can easily adapt and learn quickly to integrate the services. They have good documentation."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define."
"There is a payload size limit and we're unable to integrate some legacy applications."
"The solution is expensive."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM."
"Sometimes, the tech support is slow to get back to us. We have had to wait up to two weeks for a response."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 41 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate, Azure Data Factory and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.