We performed a comparison between OpenShift and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two PaaS Clouds solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have seen a return on investment, and it depends upon the types and the nature of some of the most critical applications that have been hosted on the OpenShift infrastructure."
"I am impressed with the product's security features."
"This solution helps us to account for peak seasons involving higher demand than usual. It also gives us confidence in the security of our overall systems."
"Great integration with Jenkins for constant integration and development. Supports all the major languages and environments - PHP, Java, Node.js, Ruby, etc."
"There is a quick deployment of the application, and we can scale out efficiently."
"Scaling and uptime of the applications are positives."
"OpenShift offers robust tools for monitoring application traffic, allowing us to analyze client requests and other business-related metrics."
"The virtualization of my APIs means I no longer have to pay VMware large amounts of money to only run in-house solutions."
"In terms of features, upgradeability to the latest version of Oracle suites has been a good feature. All we have to do is just patching or an upgrade, it's pretty easy. Then, it gets regularly updated. That's what I like about it."
"The environment is super fast so you get all the underlying machines behind the data. It's a good processing machine, especially in the Generation Two Cloud."
"The most important features are the turnkey solutions offered by Oracle. These ease the administration of Oracle Databases."
"Oracle offers more of the basic functionality needs."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Cloud are the ease of navigation and stability. The solution is more feature-rich and powerful than these smaller alternatives."
"The pricing of the solution is pretty good."
"The most valuable feature is that it offers several adaptors."
"The most valuable features of the solution are APEX, Threat Detector, and Cloud Guard."
"The tool lacks some features to make it compliant with Kubernetes"
"Some of the storage services and integrations with third-party tools should be made possible."
"There are challenges related to additional security layers, connectivity compliance for endpoints, and integration."
"OpenShift's storage management could be better."
"This is a fairly expensive solution."
"It could use auto-scaling based on criteria such as transaction volume, queue backlog, etc. Currently, it is limited to CPU and memory."
"An enhancement to consider for the future might involve incorporating a comprehensive solution for CI/CD tailored specifically for OpenShift."
"Needs work on volume handling (although this is already better with GlusterFS). Security (SSSD) would also be an improvement."
"They could add more features."
"The price of the subscription is too high and excludes some potential customers."
"The Oracle Cloud platform remains complex, and despite the abundance of resources available, significant challenges can still arise during the migration process from a legacy or on-premise system. Conversely, smaller companies with less complicated systems, such as those with a two million budget, can migrate more easily."
"The solution needs improvement in support, performance, and features."
"More technical papers could be published to help out professionals."
"They offer some basic services but the choice is not as rich as other cloud providers."
"The main issue for the clients is that they need to understand the credit payments because if it's a currency that's not dollars or euros, Oracle will always convert it into credits and that's not easy for the customer to understand at the beginning."
"I work with many clouds and I would say, in comparison, others have a better presentation of services and they have clearer steps in terms of implementation."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenShift is ranked 4th in PaaS Clouds with 53 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 3rd in PaaS Clouds with 91 reviews. OpenShift is rated 8.4, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenShift writes "Provides us with the flexibility and efficiency of cloud-native stacks while enabling us to meet regulatory constraints". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". OpenShift is most compared with Amazon AWS, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Microsoft Azure, Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and VMware Tanzu Application Service, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and Alibaba Cloud. See our OpenShift vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.