Oracle WebLogic Server vs Tomcat comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
8,033 views|7,094 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Apache Logo
6,924 views|5,947 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle WebLogic Server and Tomcat based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is quite robust in comparison to other application servers.""Oracle WebLogic Server is more secure and has full functionalities that can be used for big applications.""The technical support is responsive. They are always ready to help by various communication channels, such as Zoom calls. However, sometimes it will take a while because when we are dealing with a problem, they need to look at the logs and configuration. A lot of the issues are related to the configuration that they need to look at thoroughly before they can give us a solution and it can take a few days depending on the type of problem.""The product's installation phase is easy.""It is good because it's easy to use. It doesn't crash frequently like other servers.""Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand.""Another valuable feature is the ability to automate tasks through scripts, making our environment highly efficient.""It has helped us to have different clusters within different servers, which allows us to identify hacker attacks."

More Oracle WebLogic Server Pros →

"Tomcat is user-friendly and easy to set up, especially compared to WebLogic or JBoss where some specialty is required. If you are going for Tomcat, you can use their guidelines and can set it up easily.""Our company doesn't face any stability issues while using Tomcat.""The solution integrates smoothly with the development environment. The integration process is straightforward. You only need to configure the project in your IDE. With intelligent features, the integration becomes even easier. Once integrated, deployment into our application is straightforward. Previously, we sometimes relied on manual deployment processes or used a separate application manager. However, with this solution, deployment is simplified.""The solution is scalable.""Tomcat has connectors like REST requests to connect the front end. Also, some parts of the inter-system communication go through REST. External connections with third parties occasionally involve both REST and SOAP protocols. Tomcat is versatile in accommodating these various communication methods.""I love Tomcat for its scalability, reliability, availability, and steadiness.""Tomcat is a single-server solution for deploying applications that can scale effectively. It's a good choice because it simplifies deployment. Once you package your application, deployment is straightforward and efficient.""The solution is readily available and open-source."

More Tomcat Pros →

Cons
"Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server and other Oracle products has room for improvement because the pricing model isn't easy to understand. I'd like to see lower pricing from Oracle WebLogic Server. That's the main issue with the solution.""The error handling area in Oracle WebLogic Server is an area of concern where improvements are required.""The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files.""Having clearer mechanisms to directly map a database-level connection problem to the corresponding WebLogic thread would greatly enhance the administrator's convenience.""Its pricing should be better. We are analyzing other options, such as JBoss, because of the cost of WebLogic.""The tool's implementation should be easier. The product is also expensive.""In terms of what could be improved, maybe something related to the processes automation or starting and stopping the processes, because often WebLogic comes with something called Node Manager. Node Manager needs to be configured and administrated manually.""Licensing fees need improvement."

More Oracle WebLogic Server Cons →

"It will be useful if a direct report concerning a particular server configuration or application usage is readily available in the dashboard.""Technical support is limited.""In the solution, we are using the terminal to enter command line codes for operations and management, this is difficult for me. It would be better if we had some administrator UI tools for this.""Tomcat is a polished product that has been around for a long time. It should be simple and high-performing, with the ability to grow and maintain stability. The fewer features it has, the more stable it will be.""One way to improve the solution is by making the logging capabilities of Tomcat better by providing a logger within the server itself and making it easy to access and view the server logs. This can be especially useful when debugging issues with applications deployed on the Tomcat server. By having the ability to view both the application logs and the server logs, you can more easily identify the source of any issues and troubleshoot them more efficiently. Providing a connector or other similar feature that allows you to access the server logs from within your application can also be helpful in this regard. Having access to both the application logs and the server logs can be a valuable resource when trying to identify and resolve problems.""It would be great if they offered more integration of monitoring tools.""Sometimes we face issues with the private and public networks and ensuring that once Tomcat is installed, that it is secure.""The high availability is not as robust as the competition is such as WebLogic and Jboss."

More Tomcat Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing fees are annual and depend on the model."
  • "In our country, this is an expensive product."
  • "It is expensive."
  • "Fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • "I would not compare WebSphere and WebLogic because both servers are really good. The only difference is that Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."
  • "Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server is expensive."
  • "The solution's licensing is high-priced."
  • "The tool's pricing is yearly."
  • More Oracle WebLogic Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This is an open-source product and it's free to use."
  • "We are using the open-source version."
  • "The solution is free."
  • "Tomcat is an open source solution."
  • "We are currently using the open-source version."
  • "The price of the solution is good."
  • "I give the pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "The solution is open source so is free."
  • More Tomcat Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's installation phase is easy.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, some issues don't get fixed by Oracle's technical support team, and you need to invest time to fix them by yourself. Oracle's support team fails to understand the real problem of the… more »
    Top Answer:I use the solution in my company since few customers use WebLogic applications and also since they have a few number of applications deployed on it.
    Top Answer:Tomcat's ease of use has positively impacted project timelines. Tomcat already has high availability – it doesn't go down so often and doesn't require a lot of maintenance. As long as your application… more »
    Top Answer:Tomcat could be a little bit more innovative. Tomcat could come up with a framework that's more lightweight and purely targeted at Java applications. Some other solutions are doing better right now… more »
    Top Answer:I use it to deploy applications built with Spring Boot and Java.
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 20 in Application Server
    Views
    8,033
    Comparisons
    7,094
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    475
    Rating
    8.2
    2nd
    out of 20 in Application Server
    Views
    6,924
    Comparisons
    5,947
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    408
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebLogic Application Server
    Learn More
    Overview

    Oracle WebLogic Server 12c, the world’s first cloud-native, enterprise Java platform enables you to fully realize the benefits of cloud computing. Unique multitenancy capability drives massive consolidation. Lightweight microcontainer architecture drives application isolation and 100 percent portability between your private and public cloud. Multi data center high availability architecture protects against application disruption. Developer innovations with full Java EE 7 and Java SE8 support maximize DevOps productivity. Additionally, you continue to have access to the same platform on premises and in the cloud, via Oracle Java Cloud Service, which is based on Oracle WebLogic Server.

    For more information on Oracle Weblogic Server, visit Oracle.com

    Tomcat is a reliable and efficient web server, popular for hosting and running Java-based applications. It is praised for its scalability, compatibility with different operating systems and development frameworks, and its ability to handle heavy workloads. 

    Users appreciate Tomcat's ease of use, robust performance, reliable server functionality, seamless integration with various platforms, extensive documentation, and strong community support.

    Sample Customers
    Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Center for Railway Information Systems, SPAR Austria Group, Reliance Commercial Finance, Industrial Bank of Korea, Al Jaber Group, Safe Water Kenya, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society
    1. Adobe Systems 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. AT&T 5. Bank of America 6. Boeing 7. Cisco Systems 8. Citigroup 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. General Electric 13. Google 14. Hewlett-Packard 15. IBM 16. Intel 17. JPMorgan Chase 18. Microsoft 19. Netflix 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Salesforce 23. Samsung 24. Sony 25. Target 26. Twitter 27. Uber 28. Verizon 29. Visa 30. Volkswagen 31. Walmart 32. Yahoo
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Government14%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Recreational Facilities/Services Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm36%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Transportation Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise51%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise45%
    Buyer's Guide
    Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews while Tomcat is ranked 2nd in Application Server with 45 reviews. Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0, while Tomcat is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tomcat writes "A lightweight tool that offers efficiency in terms of memory and resource usage". Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with JBoss, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IIS, whereas Tomcat is most compared with JBoss, IBM WebSphere Application Server, IIS, Caucho Resin and TmaxSoft JEUS. See our Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat report.

    See our list of best Application Server vendors.

    We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.