We performed a comparison between Quorum OnQ and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution."
"The solution offers good documentation."
"One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration."
"The most useful feature is the one-click recovery."
"The most valuable feature of Quorum OnQ is quick recovery."
"Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery."
"The change in the way that Quorum processes data has made a tremendous improvement in backup and replication times. While the familiar interface remains, the underpinnings have been finely tuned and the speed is incredible. My large Exchange Server went from 5- to 6-hour backups down to 22 minutes."
"I like this product because it is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature has been the Live Mount feature."
"The most valuable feature of Rubrik for me is its user-friendliness and efficiency."
"The file search feature across all backups has been helpful."
"I don't know if it is the best or the worst but it's very easy to install and very easy to balance. Sometimes that it's a problem because the installer of these data gets extremely scared because it's so easy. The product is easy to install, easy to balance, and easy to work with. Another really good point is the instant recovery."
"Its reporting is most valuable. I like how it reports that everything is successfully backed up. It provides a summarized report that I can give to auditors and management."
"Rubrik has led to improvement by reducing the amount of failed backups, leading to a reduced workload in IT operations."
"Time dedicated to backup was drastically reduced."
"It has a single pane of glass interface."
"The price of Quorum OnQ could be improved. We were exploring the product in terms of having a partnership with the distributor so that we could operate as a service, but for our own use, within the company, we couldn't justify the price unless the servers would become an option later on. The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."
"There seems to be a lack of technicians. Sometimes they are very busy and I don't hear back for a day or two. The technicians they have are great. They are fantastic, but it seems difficult, at times, to get in contact with anyone."
"I paid for subscription of Firewall. I paid for subscription of endpoint protection. Thet should introduce single subscription for all services."
"Quorum OnQ's user interface is not very attractive and should be made more attractive."
"We found that some of the live SQL databases we were backing up would be inconsistent when we would restore them."
"The cost could be reduced."
"One thing that could be done to improve it would be a single pane of glass for doing disaster recovery testing, where I could have remote consoles in one place... I still have to go to each location in a browser and then bring up the console. I'd like to see them integrate that into a single pane of glass so I don't have to go to each server."
"Quorum OnQ can be improved by providing support for other operating systems like Ubuntu."
"The price of Rubrik is too high, especially when you are considering a change in the total backup solution."
"The solution could improve by having fewer VM Stuns."
"Needs integration with video CD (coming in the next release) and a multi-tenant GUI."
"The solution needs to be more secure and needs to better protect against ransomware."
"With Windows, it is difficult to configure Oracle Database."
"It is already very well furnished, but live mounts for Nutanix AHV would be amazing."
"The Office 365 protection could be improved."
"There is always room for improvement with some shortcuts for the web interface. They could make it even more beautiful."
Quorum OnQ is ranked 40th in Backup and Recovery with 21 reviews while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Backup and Recovery with 86 reviews. Quorum OnQ is rated 9.0, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Quorum OnQ writes "Took us just hours to do a complete server restore, with minimal downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Automates the backup and recovery process, reducing manual human errors and global search allows for granular recoveries". Quorum OnQ is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect and Acronis Cyber Protect, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Azure Backup and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain). See our Quorum OnQ vs. Rubrik report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors, best Cloud Backup vendors, and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
