We performed a comparison between Statseeker and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."
"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."
"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."
"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."
"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."
"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."
"It not only provides the preconfigured item monitoring feature, but it is also easy to configure custom items."
"We like the user-interface for this solution, which makes it an easy to use tool."
"The most valuable feature is network traffic monitoring."
"Like other common Linux distributions, some of the most valuable features of this solution are the ease of use and deployment. It's simple and has a lot of packages and a lot of software."
"I really enjoy network traffic triggers that allow us to check traffic threshold from ISP."
"It's a very reliable platform and we've never had any issues regarding the scalability or the stability of Zabbix."
"It provides high scalability, alerting, notification, templating, and end-to-end security."
"SNMP monitoring, source discovery, and alert triggering are most valuable."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."
"Configuration management: In configuration management it would be helpful if it would backup configuration files (running and start-up configuration) for devices. (Not sure if this is already available in the latest version)."
"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."
"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."
"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."
"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."
"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."
"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."
"The reports are not great and should be improved."
"Its UI should be improved. They did some improvements in version 5, but it could benefit from some more work. Its integrations should also be improved. They've been active for one year, and they seem to have noticed that. It has new integrations, but it could benefit from more integrations. As far as I know, there is no model to push statistics, metrics, or events towards Zabbix. This type of API isn't yet there, whereas some other tools provide an API for this."
"There are some features of Zabbix that are not good for reporting. The DX Spectrum solution has better reporting."
"For us, the initial setup was complex"
"If Zabbix had a better dashboard then it would be nice."
"The performance reporting could be improved."
"Zabbix claims that there is an auto-discovery process but my team member was facing difficulty and was told that it's not really automatic, and there are some manual steps."
"An area for improvement would be the ease of doing aggregation from the value or different devices."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. Statseeker is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Statseeker is most compared with , whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Amazon CloudWatch and SolarWinds NPM. See our Statseeker vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
